题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A temporary rule governing() with and acquisitions by foreign investors took effect on April 12 this year.一个管辖外国投资者兼并和收购中国企业的临时规则在今年的四月十二日生效。
A、merge
B、acquire
C、mergers
D、inquiries
简答题官方参考答案
（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
更多“A temporary rule governing（) with and acquisitions by foreign investors took effect”相关的问题
【C1】
A．allow
B．admit
C．present
D．grant
When a ship shall have entered a port or place of refuge or shall have returned to her port or place of loading in consequence of accident，sacrifice or other extraordinary circumstances which render that necessary for the common safety，the expenses of entering such port or place shall be admitted as general average；and when she shall have sailed thence with her original cargo，or a part of it，the corresponding expenses of leaving such port or place of refuge consequent upon such entry or return shall likewise be admitted as general average．
When a ship is at any port or place of refuge and is necessarily removed to another port or place because repairs cannot be carried out in the first port or place，the provisions of this Rule shall be applied to the second port or place as if it were a port or place of refuge and the cost of such removal including temporary repairs and towage shall be admitted as general average．
The cost of handling on board or discharging cargo，fuel or stores whether at a port or place of loading，call or refuge，shall be admitted as general average，when the handling or discharge was necessary for the common safety or to enable damage to the ship caused by sacrifice or accident to be repaired，if the repairs were necessary for the safe prosecution of the voyage，except in cases where the damage to the ship is discovered at a port or place of loading or call without any accident or other extraordinary circumstances connected with such damage having taken place during the voyage．
问题：
The cost of handling on board cargo for the purpose of restowage for the common safety shall be admitted as ________．
A.particular average
B.common average
C.general average
D.private average
The repairs ________ shall not be admitted as general average．A.necessary for the common safety
B.necessary for the safe prosecution of the voyage
C.of the steering gear in consequence of accident endangering the ship and/or her cargo
D.of the damages discovered at a port or place of loading or call without any accident or other extraordinary circumstances
________ shall not be admitted as general average．A.the expenses of entering port or place of refuge
B.the corresponding expenses of leaving port or place of refuge
C.the cost of removal from port or place of refuge including temporary repairs and towage
D.the cost of handling on board or discharging cargo，fuel or stores solely for the purpose of restowage due to shifting during the voyage
This passage is likely extracted from ________．A.Marpol
B.ISM Code
C.SOLAS
D.York-Antwerp Rules
Staff Recruitment
Recruitment refers to the process of screening, and selecting qualified people for a job at an organisation or firm, or for a vacancy in a volunteer-based organisation or community group. While generalist managers or administrators can undertake (31) components of the recruitment process, mid-and large-size organisations and companies often retain professional recruiters or outsource some of the process (32) recruitment agencies. External recruitment is the process of attracting and selecting employees from (33) the organisation.
The recruitment industry has four main types of agencies: employment agencies, recruitment websites and job search engines, "headhunters" for executive and professional recruitment, and in-house (34) Recruiters aim to channel candidates (35) the hiring organisations application process. As a general rule, the agencies are paid by the companies, (36) by the candidates.
Known as employment agencies, recruitment agencies have historically had a physical location. A candidate visits a local branch for a short interview and an assessment before (37) taken onto the agency's books. Recruitment consultants then work to match their pool of candidates to their clients' open positions. Suitable candidates are short-listed and put forward for an interview with potential employers on a temporary or (38) basis.
A "headhunter" is industry term for a thirdparty recruiter who seeks out candidates, often (39) normal recruitment efforts have failed. Headhunters are generally considered more aggressive than in-house recruiters or may have preexisting industry experience and contacts. Larger employers tend to undertake their own in-house recruitment, using their human resources department. In addition to coordinating with the agencies mentioned (40) , in-house recruiters may advertise job vacancies on their own websites, coordinate internal employee referrals, work with external associations, trade groups or focus on campus graduate recruitment.
(31)
Anderson's new theory is controversial for asserting that Britain might
have retained its North American empire had George Ⅲ's ministers proceeded
less precipitously. But as Anderson himself concedes to previous historians like
Line Henvel and Rhimes, there was no indication whether the persistence of imperial
(5) authority would have made much difference for any of the parties involved. At
most, these efforts would have endowed the British government with a
"hollow" empire, wherein the exercise of effective authority would depend on
the consent of the colonists and their representatives. While the grip on their
colonies was questionable, the British had no option but to curtail their
(10) authority, and at no point was the decision to do so more than a temporary
expedient. Once the war in French Canada was resolved, England attempted to
terminate the costly practices of Indian gift giving and to levy new taxation.
Under such circumstances, moreover, Britain would have been able to offer
only limited protections to any of America's other inhabitants, especially the
(15) Indians whose lands in the Ohio Valley were already being encroached upon by a
steady influx of European settlers. In a sense, the Seven Years' War ended up
confirming the "American" character of Britain's North American empire, an
entity over which metropolitan authority had never been more than tenuous.
Anderson's hypothesis concerning French Canada is corroborated both by
(20) the events of the American Revolution, and, less successfully, the
contemporaneous case of India, where the British successfully implemented the
colonial strategy Anderson recommends. As witnessed in Iroquoia, the Mughal
Empire's progressive collapse during the later 1740s and 1750s drew the
British, who had been in India as traders since the early seventeenth century,
(25) ever more deeply into politics on the subcontinent, first as the auxiliaries of
local grandees and eventually as political actors in their own right. When the
East India Company governed in Bengal, it did so by virtue of cleverly acting as
the Mughal Emperor's diwani (a Muslim office roughly analogous to a European
tax farmer). Despite the temptation to act unilaterally, the company's officials
(30) were never ignorant of the fact that they owed their authority to the cooperation
of local elites, who in turn accepted British rule assuming they could employ it
to their own advantage.
Anderson notes that although there were undoubtedly the vast differences
between them, India's experience of British rule during the eighteenth century
(35) points to the same devolution of imperial agency as in America. It is a pattern
Jack P. Greene has identified as "negotiated authority", whereby the unlimited
powers claimed by officials at the empire's center were subject to constant
revision by indigenous brokers on the periphery. Despite the fact that the
Indian colonial possessions were more enduring as a result, Anderson
(40) nevertheless
A．survey of the inadequacies of a conventional viewpoint
B．reconciliation of opposing points of view
C．summary and evaluation of a recent study
D．defense of a new thesis from anticipated objections
E．review of the subtle distinctions between apparently similar views
Anderson's new theory is controversial for asserting that Britain might
have retained its North American empire had George III's ministers proceeded
less precipitously. But as Anderson himself concedes to previous historians like
Henvel and Rhimes, there was no indication whether the persistence of imperial
(5) authority would have made much difference for any of the parties involved. At
most, these efforts would have endowed the British government with a
"hollow" empire, wherein the exercise of effective authority would depend on
the consent of the colonists and their representatives. While the grip on their
colonies was questionable, the British had no option but to curtail their
(10) authority, and at no point was the decision to do so more than a temporary
expedient. Once the war in French Canada was resolved, England attempted to
terminate the costly practices of Indian gift giving and to levy new taxation.
Under such circumstances, moreover, Britain would have been able to offer
only limited protections to any of America's other inhabitants, especially the
(15) Indians whose lands in the Ohio Valley were already being encroached upon by a
steady influx of European settlers. In a sense, the Seven Years' War ended up
confirming the "American" character of Britain's North American empire, an
entity over which metropolitan authority had never been more than tenuous.
Anderson's hypothesis concerning French Canada is corroborated both by
(20) the events of the American Revolution, and, less successfully, the
contemporaneous case of India, where the British successfully implemented the
colonial strategy Anderson recommends. As witnessed in Iroquoia, the Mughal
Empire's progressive collapse during the later 1740s and 1750s drew the
British, who had been in India as traders since the early seventeenth century,
(25) ever more deeply into politics on the subcontinent, first as the auxiliaries of
local grandees and eventually as political actors in their own right. When the
East India Company governed in Bengal, it did so by virtue of cleverly acting as
the Mughal Emperor's diwani (a Muslim office roughly analogous to a European
tax farmer). Despite the temptation to act unilaterally, the company's officials
(30) were never ignorant of the fact that they owed their authority to the cooperation
of local elites, who in turn accepted British rule assuming they could employ it
to their own advantage.
Anderson notes that although there were undoubtedly the vast differences
between them, India's experience of British rule during the eighteenth century
(35) points to the same devolution of imperial agency as in America. It is a pattern
Jack P. Greene has identified as "negotiated authority", whereby the unlimited
powers claimed by officials at the empire's center were subject to constant
revision by indigenous brokers on the periphery. Despite the fact that the
Indian colonial possessions were more enduring as a result, Anderson
(40) nevertheless fails to successfully argue that the British could have retained other
parts of their empire for a more significant period through any of the means he
has suggested.
The passage can best be described as a
A．survey of the inadequacies of a conventional viewpoint
B．reconciliation of opposing points of view
C．summary and evaluation of a recent study
D．defense of a new thesis from anticipated objections
E．review of the subtle distinctions between apparently similar views
Unfortunately, banks' lobbying now seems to be working. The details may be unknowable, but the independence of standard-setters, essential to the proper functioning of capital markets, is being compromised. And, unless banks carry toxic assets at prices that attract buyers, reviving the banking system will be difficult.
After a bruising encounter with Congress, America's Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) rushed through rule changes. These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long-term assets in their income statements. Bob Herz, the FASB's chairman, cried out against those who "question our motives." Yet bank shares rose and the changes enhance what one lobbying group politely calls "the use of judgment by management."
European ministers instantly demanded that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) do likewise. The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning, but the pressure to fold when it completes its reconstruction of rules later this year is strong. Charlie McCreevy, a European commissioner, warned the IASB that it did "not live in a political vacuum" but "in the real world" and that Europe could yet develop different rules.
It was banks that were on the wrong planet, with accounts that vastly overvalued assets. Today they argue that market prices overstate losses, because they largely reflect the temporary illiquidity of markets, not the likely extent of bad debts. The truth will not be known for years. But banks' shares trade below their book value, suggesting that investors are skeptical. And dead markets partly reflect the paralysis of banks which will not sell assets for fear of booking losses, yet are reluctant to buy all those supposed bargains.
To get the system working again, losses must be recognized and dealt with. America's new plan to buy up toxic assets will not work unless banks mark assets to levels which buyers find attractive. Successful markets require independent and even combative standard-setters. The FASB and IASB have been exactly that, cleaning up rules on stock options and pensions, for example, against hostility from special interests. But by giving in to critics now they are inviting pressure to make more concessions.
Bankers complained that they were forced to ______.
A．follow unfavorable asset evaluation rules.
B．collect payments from third parties.
C．cooperate with the price managers.
D．reevaluate some of their assets.
A．www.
B．www. whitehouse
C．www. whitehouse. gov
D．whitehouse. gov
警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
