搜题
网友您好,请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:
搜题
题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友lee_0029 发布时间:2022-01-07
[主观题]

The main forms In participatory and interactive speaking and listening involve face to face conversations, seminars, and tutorials.

简答题官方参考答案 (由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
查看官方参考答案
更多“The main forms In participatory and interactive speaking and listening involve face to face conversa…”相关的问题
第1题
【判断题】Thebreak even point is located at the intersection of the total revenue line andthe total expenses line on a cost volume profit graph.
点击查看答案
第2题
On average, American kids aged 3 to 12 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more than they did in 1981. They also did more household work and participated in more of such organized activities as soccer and ballet. Involvement in sports, in particular, rose almost 50% from 1981 to 1997: boys now spend an average of four hours a week playing sports; girls log half that time. All in all, however, children's leisure time dropped from 40% of the day in 1981 to 25%.

"Children are affected by the same time crunch that affects their parents," says Sandra Hofferth, who headed the recent study of children's timetable. A chief reason, she says, is that more mothers are working outside the home. (Nevertheless, children in both double-income and "male breadwinner" households spent comparable amounts of time interacting with their parents, 19 hours and 22 hours respectively. In contrast, children spent only 9 hours with their single mothers.)

All work and no play could make for some very messed-up kids. "Play is the most powerful way a child explores the world and learns about himself," says T. Berry Brazelton, professor at Harvard Medical School. Unstructured play encourages independent thinking and allows the young to negotiate their relationships with their peers, but kids aged 3 to 12 spent only 12 hours a week engaged in it.

The children sampled spent a quarter of their rapidly decreasing "free time"watching television. But that, believe it or not, was one of the findings parents might regard as good news. If they're spending less time in front of the TV set, however, kids aren't replacing it with reading. Despite efforts to get kids more interested in books, the children spent just over an hour a week reading. Let's face it, who's got the time?

By mentioning "the same time crunch" (Para. 2) Sandra Hofferth means

A.children have little time to play with their parents.

B.children are not taken good care of by their working parents.

C.both parents and children suffer from lack of leisure time.

D.both parents and children have trouble managing their time.

点击查看答案
第3题
in the favour of sb.
点击查看答案
第4题

Davos: Can Connectivity Feed The World? By Lilianne Ploumen, Peter Schwartz and Lorin Fries What do elections, cell phones and social media have to do with the food on your plate? More than you might think. We've entered a new global era. In the midst of a shifting geopolitical landscape, the accelerating pace of technology, and unprecedented inequality, our diets might seem like a modest concern. Yet the food we choose to eat – and the systems that deliver it – are among the most powerful forces shaping the world. What will we consume in the future? And how can this food be healthy for people without over-taxing the planet? The answers are complex. But one element is apparent: feeding a world of 8.5 billion people nutritiously and sustainably by 2030 will depend on connectivity. Putting good food on every plate depends on trade, technology, communication and collaboration in an interconnected world. Yet we are growing more geopolitically disconnected. After an era of increasing globalization, we are reversing course. Nations that have historically been drivers of open trade and alliance-building have turned inward, prioritizing domestic concerns. Collaborative norms and international institutions are being questioned. And these changes are underpinned by increasing wealth and power disparity. What might this mean for the world’s food systems? Such fragmentation could drive starker social and economic divisions between the affluent and the poor, creating islands of plenty along with hunger hotspots. It could also provoke new tensions: Nigeria depends on food imports to feed its population of 186 million, which is expected to exceed 260 million by 2030. What might be the cost of food in Lagos if Nigeria’s trade is weakened or cut off, and with what consequences for poverty, hunger, social stability and migration? Another medium of connectivity – technology – has the potential to link and serve people across geography, class and culture. But without care, it could benefit only wealthy citizens while leaving the poorest behind. One look into the future shows a world reshaped by innovation, and such changes will impact food in unexpected ways: a meal in 2030 may have been grown in a lab, harvested by robots or chosen on a personalized nutrition app. Yet many of the most powerful innovations are less visible: technologies that increase connectivity – such as mobile platforms and the internet – hold profound promise to chip away at problems like hunger. A digital divide currently separates the 4 billion people disconnected on the internet from the rest of the world. How much economic growth could we stimulate if every smallholder farmer accessed accurate market data on her phone to inform planting and selling choices? And of the 40% of food that is lost in most of the developing world, how much could be saved if trucks on remote roads were equipped with spoilage sensors? Unprecedented social connectivity means that new norms spread quickly – for good or bad. Nearly half of the global population eats an unhealthy diet, and this trend is likely to worsen. Especially among the growing middle class in regions like Asia, billions of people are transitioning towards diets high in sugar, salt, fat and meat. And while food choices are influenced by factors ranging from price to convenience to culture, they are also a product of social aspirations, informed and perpetuated by social connectivity. Social media is a high-speed train; when used intentionally, the tracks can be laid towards better choices for people and the planet. Such choices shape the whole system, from fork to farm – so what would it look like if cultural icons appeared on advertisements for vegetables? Or if wasting food were a social taboo? In our own professional roles, we solve problems through technology and platforms for collaboration. So when the World Economic Forum’s expert network identified market connectivity as one of the foremost factors that will shape the future of food, we were intrigued. This finding is part of a new Scenarios Analysis on the Future of Global Food Systems that will be discussed at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos next week. What might it mean for decision-making by companies, policy-makers, civil society leaders – and for all of us, at the grocery store? The scenarios provide a thought-provoking glimpse into the ways that changing demand and market connectivity could reshape our world by 2030. Depending on the choices we make, we could face an unsustainable world of “unchecked consumption,” an unequal world of “survival of the richest,” a fragmented world in which “local is the new global,” or an interconnected world of “open-source sustainability.” All of these appear possible from our current vantage point. The actions we take today cast long shadows on the future. Considering scenarios shows us the importance of business innovation, smart policy and proactive social sector engagement to achieve our long-term goals. These actions will need to be taken in tandem by many diverse actors, aligning efforts to sustainably nourish the world by 2030, linked to the Sustainable Development Goals. That will require an ambitious transformation of the status quo, but connectivity and innovation can help us get there. Let’s collaborate to chart a path toward the future we want – to put good food on every plate while protecting the planet. Please Answer the following questions according to the passage above: Which one of the following items dose not seem to be a major concern in the new global era?

A、Shifting geopolitical landscape

B、The accelerating pace of technology

C、Unprecedented inequality

D、The food we choose to eat

点击查看答案
第5题
According to Nunan, there are three majors steps involved in successful advanced speaking process, i.e. transanctional and interpersonal skills, managing interaction, and negotiating meanings.
点击查看答案
第6题
Core modules in this course includes critical thinking training,discussion with specific hot issue, and further application in extended listening and speaking practise.
点击查看答案
第7题
Critical thinking involves reason and logic.
点击查看答案
重要提示: 请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁!
查看《购买须知》>>>
重置密码
账号:
旧密码:
新密码:
确认密码:
确认修改
购买搜题卡查看答案
购买前请仔细阅读《购买须知》
请选择支付方式
微信支付
支付宝支付
点击支付即表示你同意并接受《服务协议》《购买须知》
立即支付
搜题卡使用说明

1. 搜题次数扣减规则:

功能 扣减规则
基础费
(查看答案)
加收费
(AI功能)
文字搜题、查看答案 1/每题 0/每次
语音搜题、查看答案 1/每题 2/每次
单题拍照识别、查看答案 1/每题 2/每次
整页拍照识别、查看答案 1/每题 5/每次

备注:网站、APP、小程序均支持文字搜题、查看答案;语音搜题、单题拍照识别、整页拍照识别仅APP、小程序支持。

2. 使用语音搜索、拍照搜索等AI功能需安装APP(或打开微信小程序)。

3. 搜题卡过期将作废,不支持退款,请在有效期内使用完毕。

请使用微信扫码支付(元)

订单号:

遇到问题请联系在线客服

请不要关闭本页面,支付完成后请点击【支付完成】按钮
遇到问题请联系在线客服
恭喜您,购买搜题卡成功 系统为您生成的账号密码如下:
重要提示:请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁。
发送账号到微信 保存账号查看答案
怕账号密码记不住?建议关注微信公众号绑定微信,开通微信扫码登录功能
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

- 微信扫码关注简答题 -
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
- 微信扫码关注简答题 -
请用微信扫码测试
欢迎分享答案

为鼓励登录用户提交答案,简答题每个月将会抽取一批参与作答的用户给予奖励,具体奖励活动请关注官方微信公众号:简答题

简答题官方微信公众号

简答题
下载APP
关注公众号
TOP