题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
Kimberly had been given to Mr. May ______.
A．by sheer accident
B．out of charity
C．at his request
D．for better care
简答题官方参考答案
（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
更多“Kimberly had been given to Mr. May ______.A．by sheer accidentB．out of charityC．at his requ”相关的问题
Kimberly had been given to Mr. Mays ______.
A．by sheer accident
B．out of charity
C．at his request
D．for better care
Kimberly had been given to Mr. Mays ______.
A．by sheer accident
B．at his request
C．out of charity
D．for hatter care
From the passage we can be certain that ______.
A．the Doctor's first wife had died
B．Mrs. Gibson/lad no children of her own
C．Mrs. Gibson had never been married before
D．the doctor had never had another wife
27th, September
Dear Jamie,
I was so sorry to hear about the death of your dog. You have told me on several occasions how close the two of you were, and how much you I oved him I know you wi II miss him deeply. I only wish I had the words that could ease your pain.
I am glad that you had such a great relationship with old Peter, and I sincerely hope that your memories will give you comfort.
I'll give you a call next week to find out what day you'd like me to drive your car for you. You have my deepest sympathies.
kimberly
What is the main theme of this note？
A．Conveying kimberly's love for Jamie's dog
B．Showing sympathy for the death of Jamie's dog
C．Expressing kimberly's thinking of Jamie
D．Informing Jamie of the malfunction of her car
Breastfeeding(母乳喂养) for a month or longer appears to reduce a woman's risk of getting diabetes(糖尿病) later in life, according to a new study．The breastfeeding and diabetes link has been reported in other studies, according to researcher Eleanor Schwarz．Yet, her study makes the link easier to believe．Her study is published in a journal of medicine in America．Schwarz and her colleagues looked at data about breastfeeding practices．They evaluated data on 2,233 women from California．Of those, 405were not mothers, 1,125 were mothers who breastfed for at least a month, and 703 were mothers who had never breastfed．They were 40 to 78 years old.
According to Schwarz's study, the risk of getting a diagnosis(诊断) of Type 2 diabetes for women who breastfed all their children for a month or longer was similar to that of women who had not given birth．But mothers who had never breastfed were nearly twice as likely to develop diabetes as women who had never given birth．Mothers who never breastfed were about 1．4 times as likely to develop diabetes as women who breastfed for one to three months, Schwarz found.
While one month of breastfeeding appears to make a difference, Schwarz says, even longer is better．(76)"Previous studies have shown the longer the mom breastfeeds, the more benefit for her body." Many experts recommend breastfeeding for six months and continuing for a year, she says.
The diabetes-breastfeeding link is probably explained by belly fat．Mothers, who don't breastfeed, as they get older, may have more belly fat, as breastfeeding helps new mothers take off weight．"Belly fat increases the risk of diabetes as you get older," she says.
The finding isn't surprising at all, says Kimberly Gregory．She often gives advice to women who get diabetes occurring during pregnancy(怀孕) that they are at risk for later getting Type 2 diabetes and suggests they breastfeed．The new findings will probably inspire Gregory to add to the advice she gives moms-to-be about the benefits of breastfeeding．She often focuses on the benefits to the baby.
According to the first paragraph, which of the following statements is TRUE？
A．About two thousand and two hundred old women took part in the study.
B．Eleanor Schwarz's research program was about men and women who suffered from diabetes.
C．Over one fifths of the women never got married.
D．Eleanor Schwarz's results seem more reliable.
Fourteen-year-old Kimberly May fits neither description, but her recent court victory could eventually help children who do. Kimberly has been the object of an angry custody baffle between the man who raised her and her biological parents, with whom she has never lived. A Florida judge ruled that the teenager remain with the only father she's ever known and that her biological parents have "no legal claim" on her.
The ruling, though it may yet be reversed, sets aside the principle. that biology is the primary determinant of parentage. That's an important development, one that's long overdue.
Shortly after birth in December 1978, Kimberly May and another infant were mistakenly switched and sent home with the wrong parents. Kimberly's biological parents, Ernest and Regina Twigg, received a child who died of a heart disease in 1988. Medical tests showed that the child wasn't the Twiggs' own daughter, but Kimberly was, thus sparking a custody baffle with Robert May. In 1989, the two families agreed that Mr. May would maintain custody with the Twiggs getting visiting rights. Those rights were brought to an end when Mr. May decided that Kimberly was being harmed.
The decision to leave Kimberly with Mr. May rendered her suit debated. But the judge made it clear that Kimberly did have standing to sue on her own behalf, therefore she was more than just property to be handled as adults saw fit.
Certainly, the biological link between parent and child is fundamental. But biological parents aren't always preferable to adoptive ones, and biological parentage does not convey an absolute ownership that cancels all the rights of children.
What was the primary consideration in the Florida judge's ruling？
A．The biological link.
B．The child's benefits.
C．The traditional practice.
D．The parents' feelings.
Fourteen-year-old Kimberly Mays fits neither description, but her recent court victory could eventually help children who do. Kimberly has been the object of an angry custody battle between the man who raised her and her biological parents, with whom she has never lived. A Florida judge ruled that the teenager can remain with the only father she's ever known and that her biological parents have "no legal c/aim" on her.
The ruling, though it may yet be reversed, sets aside the principle that biology is the primary determinant of parentage. That's an important development, one that's long overdue.
Shortly after birth in December 1978, Kimberly Mays and another infant were mistakenly switched and sent home with the wrong parents. Kimberly' s biological parents, Ernest and Regina Twigg, received a child who died of a heart disease in 1988. Medical tests showed that the child wash' t the Twiggs' own daughter, but kimberly was, thus sparking a custody battle with Robert Mays. In 1989, the two families agreed that Mr. Mays would maintain custody with the Twiggs getting visiting rights. Those rights were ended when Mr. Mays decided that Kimberly was being harmed.
The decision to leave Kimberly with Mr. Mays rendered her suit debated. But the judge made clear that Kimberly did have standing to sue on her own behalf. Thus he made clear that she was more than just property to be handled as adults saw fit.
Certainly, the biological link between parent and child is fundamental. But biological parents aren't always preferable to adoptive ones, and biological parentage does not convey an absolute ownership that cancels all the rights of children.
What was the primary consideration in the Florida judge's ruling？
A．The biological link.
B．The child's benefits.
C．The traditional practice.
D．The parents' feelings.
What does the woman mean？
A．She has bought a dress.
B．She has made a dress.
C．She has been given a dress.
Fourteen-year-old Kimberly Mays fits neither description, but her recent court victory could eventually help children who do. Kimberly has been the object of an angry custody baffle between the man who raised her and her biological parents, with whom she has never lived. A Florida judge ruled that the teenager can remain with the only father she’s ever known and that her biological parents have “no legal claim” on her.
The ruling, though it may yet be reversed, sets aside the principle that biology is the primary determinant of parentage. That’s an important development, one that’s long overdue.
Shortly after birth in December 1978, Kimberly Mays and another infant were mistakenly switched and sent home with the wrong parents. Kimberly’s biological parents, Ernest and Regina Twigg, received a child who died of a heart disease in 1988. Medical tests showed that the child wasn’t the Twiggs’ own daughter, but Kimt only was, thus sparking a custody battle with Robert Mays. In 1989, the two families agreed that Mr. Mays would maintain custody with the Twiggs getting visiting fights. Those rights were ended when Mr. Mays decided that Kimberly was being harmed.
The decision to leave Kimberly with Mr. Mays rendered her suit debated. But the judge made clear that Kimberly did have standing to sue （起诉） on her own behalf. Thus he made clear that she was more than just property to be handled as adults saw fit.
Certainly, the biological link between parent and child is fundamental. But biological parents aren’t always preferable to adoptive ones, and biological parentage does not convey an absolute ownership that cancels all the rights of children.
第36题：What was the primary consideration in the Florida judge’s ruling？
A．The biological link.
B．The child’s benefits.
C．The traditional practice.
D．The parents’ feelings.
警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
