搜题
网友您好,请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:
搜题
题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
提问人:网友liuyang1110 发布时间:2022-01-06
[主观题]

Leacock was probably the first Canadian to qualify as a "pro-American British imperialist.

" A colleague, Prof. John Culliton, said of him, "Long before Winston Churchill, Leacock was saving the Empire every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 3 p. m. in Room 20." He was also ahead of his time in prodding Americans and Britons toward greater friendship and understanding.

His feeling for both sides of the Atlantic came naturally. He was born on the Isle of Wight in 1869, and emigrated to Canada as a six-year-old. On his retirement from McGill, influential English friends urged him to return to live in the land of his birth. He refused, saying, "I'd hate to be so far away from the United States. It's second nature, part of our lives, to be near them. Every Sunday morning we read the New York funny papers. All week we hear about politics in Alabama and Louisiana, and whether they caught the bandits who stole the vault of the National Bank —well, you know American news. There's no other like it."

In the eight years of his retirement, Stephen produced the work he believed most likely to endure. It was far removed from the kind of wit which had made him famous. He described his history, Montreal: Seaport and City, as "the best job I've done." Unlike most historical works it bubbles with the author's laughter. In his foreword, after thanking two former colleagues for checking the manuscript, he added that any errors which remained obviously must be theirs. "Acknowledging these debts," he concluded, "I also feel that I owe a good deal of this book to my own industry and effort."

Midway through World War Ⅱ, I asked Stephen if he would write a foreword for a book I had written on the Canadian navy and its gallant role in convoy escort. He agreed. Some time later he handed me more than 20,000 words, in which he had told the whole fascinating background story of Canada's lifelong relationship to the sea. His research was staggering to a reporter who had simply described events and engagements to which he had been an eyewitness.

"I got interested in the subject," he explained. "If you don't like it, throw it away and I'll write something shorter."

Not a word was changed. To my joy, the book appeared under our joint by-lines. Soon after, throat cancer took Stephen from the thousands of Old McGillers who loved him.

Leacock loved human beings for their little vanities and pretensions —and laughed at his own. The fictional town of Mariposa of his famous "Sunshine Sketches" is obviously Orillia, Ontario, where Leacock built a summer home and developed a farm, which, he said, "used to lose a few dollars a year, but by dint of hard work and modernization, I have contrived to turn that into a loss of thousands." The citizens of Oriilia had little difficulty in self-identification when the book reached town, but they soon realized that Leacock had ribbed his own idiosyncrasies more sharply than he had pinpointed theirs. Today% Orillians speak of him with the awe given to any community's adopted son, though it was he who adopted Mariposa-Orillia.

Stephen Leacock was so honestly simple that to many men he seemed to be a mass of complexities. To the world he remains the man of laughter. His greatest achievement, however, was that he taught thousands of young men and women who want to know. By example he proved one simple fact to all of us who attended his classes, certainly to that numerous crew who came to enjoy his friendship —that the right of outspoken dissent is the free man's most precious heritage. Such men do not often pass this way.

Why was Leacock dubbed as a "pro-American British imperialist"?

A.Because he was a Briton who adored American politics.

B.Because he liked to read American newspapers.

C.Because he lectured on the importance of friendship between U.S. and Britain.

D.Because he chose to live close to America.

简答题官方参考答案 (由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答)
查看官方参考答案
更多“Leacock was probably the first Canadian to qualify as a "pro-American British imperialist.”相关的问题
第1题
Leacock was probably the first Canadian to qualify as a "pro-American British imperialist.
" A colleague, Prof. John Culliton, said of him, "Long before Winston Churchill, Leacock was saving the Empire every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 3 p.m. in Room 20." He was also ahead of his time in prodding Americans anti BriTons toward greater friendship and understanding.

His feeling for both sides of the Atlantic came naturally. He was born on the Isle of Wight in 1869, and emigrated to Canada as a six-year-01d. On his retirement from McGill, influential English friends urged him to return to live in the land of his birth. He refused, saying, "I' d hate to be so far away from the United States. It's second nature, part of Our lives, to be near them. Every Sunday morning we read the New York funny papers. All week we hear about politics in Alabama and Louisiana, and whether they caught the bandits who stole the vault of the National Bank — well, you know American news. There's no other like it."

In the eight years of his retirement, Stephen produced the work he believed most likely to endure. It was far removed from the kind of wit which had made him famous. He described his history, Montreal: Seaport and City, as "the best job I've done." Unlike most historical works it bubbles with the author' s laughter. In his foreword, after thanking two former colleagues for checking the manuscript, he added that any errors which remained obviously must be theirs. "Acknowledging these debts," he concluded, "I also feel that I owe a good deal of this book to my own industry and effort."

Midway through World War II, I asked Stephen if he would write a foreword for a book I had written on the Canadian navy and its gallant role in convoy escort. He agreed. Some time later he handed me more than 20,000 words, in which he had told the whole fascinating background story of Canada's lifelong relationship to the sea. His research was staggering to a reporter who had simply described events and engagements to which he had been an eyewitness.

"I got interested in the subject," he explained. "If you don't like it, throw it away and I'll write something shorter."

Not a word was changed. To my joy, the book appeared under our joint by-lines. Soon after, throat cancer took Stephen from the thousands of Old McGillers who loved him.

Leacock loved human beings for their little vanities and pretensions — and laughed at his own. The fictional town of Mariposa of his famous "Sunshine Sketches" is obviously Orillia,

Ontario, where Leacock built a summer home and developed a farm, which, he said, "used to lose a few dollars a year, but by dint of hard work and modernization, I have contrived to' turn that into a loss of thousands." The citizens of Orillia had tittle difficulty in self-identification when the book reached town, but they soon realized that Leacock had ribbed his own idiosyncrasies more sharply than he had pinpointed theirs. Today's Orillians speak of him with the awe giyen to any community's adopted son, though it was he who adopted Mariposa-OriUia.

Stephen Leacock was so honestly simple that to many men he seemed to be a mass of complexities. To the world he remains the man of laughter. His greatest achievement, however, was that he taught thousands of young men and women to want to know. By example he proved one simple fact to all of us who attended his classes, certainly to that numerous crew who came to enjoy his friendship — that the right ofoutspoken dissent is the free man's most precious heritage. Such men do not often pass this way.

Why was Leacock dubbed as a "pro-American British imperialist"?______

A.Because he was a Briton who adored American politics.

B.Because he liked to read American newspapers.

C.Because he lectured on the importance of friendship between U.S. arid Britain.

D.Because he chose to live close to America.

点击查看答案
第2题
Leacock was probably the first Canadian to qualify as a "pro-American British imperialist.
" A colleague, Prof. John Culliton, said of him, "Long before Winston Churchill, Leacock was saving the Empire every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 3 p. m. in Room 20." He was also ahead of his time in prodding Americans and Britons toward greater friendship and understanding.

His feeling for both sides of the Atlantic came naturally. He was born on the Isle of Wight in 1869, and emigrated to Canada as a six-year-old. On his retirement from McGill, influential English friends urged him to return to live in the land of his birth. He refused, saying, "I'd hate to be so far away from the United States. It's second nature, part of our lives, to be near them. Every Sunday morning we read the New York funny papers. All week we hear about politics in Alabama and Louisiana, and whether they caught the bandits who stole the vault of the National Bank —well, you know American news. There's no other like it."

In the eight years of his retirement, Stephen produced the work he believed most likely to endure. It was far removed from the kind of wit which had made him famous. He described his history, Montreal: Seaport and City, as "the best job I've done." Unlike most historical works it bubbles with the author's laughter. In his foreword, after thanking two former colleagues for checking the manuscript, he added that any errors which remained obviously must be theirs. "Acknowledging these debts," he concluded, "I also feel that I owe a good deal of this book to my own industry and effort."

Midway through World War Ⅱ, I asked Stephen if he would write a foreword for a book I had written on the Canadian navy and its gallant role in convoy escort. He agreed. Some time later he handed me more than 20,000 words, in which he had told the whole fascinating background story of Canada's lifelong relationship to the sea. His research was staggering to a reporter who had simply described events and engagements to which he had been an eyewitness.

"I got interested in the subject," he explained. "If you don't like it, throw it away and I'll write something shorter."

Not a word was changed. To my joy, the book appeared under our joint by-lines. Soon after, throat cancer took Stephen from the thousands of Old McGillers who loved him.

Leacock loved human beings for their little vanities and pretensions —and laughed at his own. The fictional town of Mariposa of his famous "Sunshine Sketches" is obviously Orillia, Ontario, where Leacock built a summer home and developed a farm, which, he said, "used to lose a few dollars a year, but by dint of hard work and modernization, I have contrived to turn that into a loss of thousands." The citizens of Oriilia had little difficulty in self-identification when the book reached town, but they soon realized that Leacock had ribbed his own idiosyncrasies more sharply than he had pinpointed theirs. Today% Orillians speak of him with the awe given to any community's adopted son, though it was he who adopted Mariposa-Orillia.

Stephen Leacock was so honestly simple that to many men he seemed to be a mass of complexities. To the world he remains the man of laughter. His greatest achievement, however, was that he taught thousands of young men and women who want to know. By example he proved one simple fact to all of us who attended his classes, certainly to that numerous crew who came to enjoy his friendship —that the right of outspoken dissent is the free man's most precious heritage. Such men do not often pass this way.

Why was Leacock dubbed as a "pro-American British imperialist"?

A.Because he was a Briton who adored American politics.

B.Because he liked to read American newspapers.

C.Because he lectured on the importance of friendship between U.S. and Britain.

D.Because he chose to live close to America.

点击查看答案
第3题
Leacock was probably 'the first Canadian to qualify as a "pro-American British imperialist
." A colleague, Prof. John Culliton, said of him, "Long before Winston Churchill, Leacock was saving the Empire every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 3 p. m. in Room 20.' He was also ahead of his time in prodding Americans and Britons toward greater friendship and understanding.

His feeling for both sides of the Atlantic came naturally. He was born on the Isle of Wight in 1869, and emigrated to Canada as a six-year-old. On his retirement from McGill, influential English friends urged him to return to live in the land of his birth. He refused, saying, "I'd hate to be so far away from the United States. It's second nature, part of our lives, to Joe near them. Every Sunday morning we read the New York funny papers. All week we hear about politics in Alabama and Louisiana, and whether they caught the bandits who stole the vault of the National Bank--well, you know American news. There's no other like it."

In the eight years of his retirement; Stephen produced the work he believed most likely to endure. It was far removed from the kind of wit which had made him famous. He described his history, Montreal: Seaport and City, as "the best job I've done." Unlike most historical works it bubbles with the author's laughter. In his foreword, after thanking two former colleagues for checking the manuscript, he added that any errors which remained obviously must be theirs. "Acknowledging these debts," he concluded, "I also feel that I owe a good deal of this book to my own industry and effort."

Midway through World War II, I asked Stephen if he would write a foreword for a book I had written on the Canadian navy and its gallant role in convoy escort. He agreed. Some time later he handed me more than 20,000 words, in which he had told the whole fascinating background story of Canada's lifelong relationship to the sea. His research was staggering to a reporter who had simply described events and engagements to which he had been an eyewitness.

"I got interested in the subject," he explained. "If you don't like it, throw it away and I'll write something shorter,"

Not a word was changed. To my joy, the book appeared under our joint bylines. Soon after, throat cancer took Stephen from the thousands of Old McGillers who loved him.

Leacock loved human beings for their little vanities and pretensions—and laughed at his own. The fictional town of Mariposa of his famous "Sunshine Sketches" is obviously Orillia, Ontario, where Leacock built a summer home and developed a farm, which, he said, "used to lose a few dollars a year, but by dint of hard work and modernization, I have contrived to turn that into a loss of thousands." The citizens of Orillia had little difficulty in self identification when the book reached town, but they soon realized that Leacock had ribbed his own idiosyncrasies more sharply than he had pinpointed theirs. Today’s Orillians speak of him with the awe given to any community's adopted son, though it was he who adopted Mariposa-Orillia.

Stephen Leacock was so honestly simple that to many men he seemed to be a mass of complexities. To the world he remains the man of laughter. His greatest achievement, however, was that he taught thousands of young men and women who want to know. By example he proved one simple fact to all of us who attended his classes, certainly to that numerous crew who came to enjoy his friendship—that the right of outspoken dissent is the free man's most precious heritage. Such men do not often pass this way.

Why was Leacock dubbed as a "pro-American British imperialist"?

A.Because he was a Briton who adored American politics.

B.Because he liked to read American newspapers.

C.Because he lectured on the importance of friendship between U.S. and Britain.

D.Because he chose to live close to America.

点击查看答案
第4题
While still at college,Miss Leacock had her first novel published.
点击查看答案
第5题
Leacock's account of being summoned to look at a stewardess's knee ______.A.tells us that

Leacock's account of being summoned to look at a stewardess's knee ______.

A.tells us that he was always ready to help others

B.indicates that he was an incompetent doctor

C.reveals that he was very proud of his degree

D.shows that he could be playful sometimes

点击查看答案
第6题
Stephen Leacock could be described as all of the following EXCEPT ______.A.careless about

Stephen Leacock could be described as all of the following EXCEPT ______.

A.careless about his appearance

B.witty and eloquent

C.an inspiring professor

D.an absent-minded person

点击查看答案
第7题
Leacock can be described as all of the following EXCEPT ______.A.a historianB.aloofC.humor

Leacock can be described as all of the following EXCEPT ______.

A.a historian

B.aloof

C.humorous

D.an immigrant

点击查看答案
第8题
The book on the fictional town of Mariposa presumably ______.A.related the success of Leac

The book on the fictional town of Mariposa presumably ______.

A.related the success of Leacock's farm

B.joked about the peculiarities of the people in Orillia

C.exemplified the industry and effort of the author

D.was the work most likely to endure

点击查看答案
第9题
The book on the fictional town of Mariposa presumably______.A.related to the success of Le

The book on the fictional town of Mariposa presumably______.

A.related to the success of Leacock's farm

B.jokedabout the peculiarities of the people in Orillia

C.exemplified the industry and effort of the author

D.was the work most likely to endure

点击查看答案
第10题
The first time I saw Stephen Leacock at close quarters he came swinging into a classroom i
n Moyse Hall, the serenely ugly old Arts Building of McGill University in Montreal. The room was packed with undergraduates like me who had come with huge curiosity to listen to their first lecture on political science by a man whose humorous writing had rocked the English-speaking world with laughter, but who was a campus character for very different reasons.

Leacock enjoyed a reputation for eccentricity and for an impish individualism that expressed itself in blunt speech on every subject. Naturally we looked him over carefully.

What we saw was a shock of graying hair crowning a rugged face that wore a friendly smile, emphasized by crinkles of mirth about the eyes. I remember thinking, "He could use a haircut." His necktie had slipped its moorings, and his tweedy suit looked slept-in. Across his vest his watch chain had come apart in the middle and had been put together with a safety pin. The effect was of a man who gave no thought to his appearance. But his manner was far too buoyant to suggest the absent-minded professor.

His apparel was topped by one of those loose, black gowns professors wore in those days. Leacoek's had been acquired about the time he received his Ph. D. from the University of Chicago in 1903. Even though the garment was showing signs of wear in 1914, it was still one of the essential properties of his play-acting. At least a dozen times during every lecture it would slip off his shoulders and seize him by the crook of his elbows. Without pause in the flow of talk and motion—he was a walking lecturer— great shrug of the shoulders would hoist the gown part way into place.

Leacock was tremendously proud of his Chicago Ph. D. , but it was inescapably in character that he must spoof it. "The meaning of this degree," he quipped in a lecture, "is that the recipient has been examined for the last time in his life and pronounced full. After this, no new ideas can be imparted to him."

In similar vein, after returning from a holiday abroad he told his class, "I was sitting quietly in my cabin when a steward knocked and, after making sure I am called Doctor, asked if I would come and look at the stewardesses knee. I was off like a shot, but another fellow got there ahead of me. He was a Doctor of Divinity."

What came through to me, even in the first lecture, was Leacock' s warmth and humanness. I knew I was listening to a man who loved young people and was determined to give them as much wisdom as he could. His teaching methods were unconventional. He couldn't resist the temptation to explore bypaths. In discussing the days of Queen Victoria, he mentioned Disraeli, and this set him off to talk about the man rather than the Prime Minister—his way of living, his quick mind, his dilettantism, his great love affair with his wife. The digression lifted the great statesman into a framework of his own and, when Leacock returned to the main line of his subject, the listener understood, in a way no textbook could inform. him, how such a man could bring off the coup which gave Britain control of the Suez Canal and made the Empire impregnable for decades to come.

The student were eager to see Leacock because he was ______.

A.an eccentric character

B.an unconventional teacher

C.a renowned political scientist

D.all of the above

点击查看答案
第11题
Judging by the appearance,they are probably Japanese.
点击查看答案
重要提示: 请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁!
查看《购买须知》>>>
重置密码
账号:
旧密码:
新密码:
确认密码:
确认修改
购买搜题卡查看答案
购买前请仔细阅读《购买须知》
请选择支付方式
微信支付
支付宝支付
点击支付即表示你同意并接受《服务协议》《购买须知》
立即支付
搜题卡使用说明

1. 搜题次数扣减规则:

功能 扣减规则
基础费
(查看答案)
加收费
(AI功能)
文字搜题、查看答案 1/每题 0/每次
语音搜题、查看答案 1/每题 2/每次
单题拍照识别、查看答案 1/每题 2/每次
整页拍照识别、查看答案 1/每题 5/每次

备注:网站、APP、小程序均支持文字搜题、查看答案;语音搜题、单题拍照识别、整页拍照识别仅APP、小程序支持。

2. 使用语音搜索、拍照搜索等AI功能需安装APP(或打开微信小程序)。

3. 搜题卡过期将作废,不支持退款,请在有效期内使用完毕。

请使用微信扫码支付(元)

订单号:

遇到问题请联系在线客服

请不要关闭本页面,支付完成后请点击【支付完成】按钮
遇到问题请联系在线客服
恭喜您,购买搜题卡成功 系统为您生成的账号密码如下:
重要提示:请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁。
发送账号到微信 保存账号查看答案
怕账号密码记不住?建议关注微信公众号绑定微信,开通微信扫码登录功能
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

- 微信扫码关注简答题 -
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反简答题购买须知被冻结。您可在“简答题”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
- 微信扫码关注简答题 -
请用微信扫码测试
欢迎分享答案

为鼓励登录用户提交答案,简答题每个月将会抽取一批参与作答的用户给予奖励,具体奖励活动请关注官方微信公众号:简答题

简答题官方微信公众号

简答题
下载APP
关注公众号
TOP