A.120B.1,200C.1,020D.200
A.120
B.1,200
C.1,020
D.200
A.120
B.1,200
C.1,020
D.200
B.Cyclists are not aware of traffic regulations.
C.Pedestrians often walk on the bicycle lanes.
D.There are too many motorists in the street.
A.In soccer and basketball, the ethic standards of sportsmen are different.
B.Up to now, professional soccer teams in America have been importing balls from overseas.
C.It is the most popular game in the world and now many American citizens start to like it.
D.In America, the craze for soccer is mostly possessed by new immigrants from South American and European countries.
A.bold.
B.harmful.
C.careless.
D.desperate.
A.worried
B.delighted
C.puzzled
D.indifferent
A.Straitford's prediction about Ukraine has proved tree
B.Straitford guarantees the truthfulness of its information
C.Straitford's business is characterized by unpredictability
D.Straitford is able to provide fairly reliable information
One of London Zoo's recent advertisements caused me some irritation, so patently did it distort reality. Headlined "Without zoos you might as well tell these animals to get stuffed", it was bordered with illustrations of several endangered species and went on to extol the myth that without zoos like London Zoo these animals "will almost certainly disappear forever". With the zoo world's rather mediocre record on conservation, one might be forgiven for being slightly skeptical about such an advertisement.
Zoos were originally created as places of entertainment, and their suggested involvement with conservation didn't seriously arise until about 30 years ago, when the Zoological Society of London held the first formal international meeting on the subject. Eight years later, a series of world conferences took place, entitled "The Breeding of Endangered Species", and from this point onwards conservation became the zoo community's buzzword. Tiffs commitment has now been clearly defined in The World Zoo Conservation Strategy (WZCS, September 1993), which-although an important and welcome document-does seem to be based on an unrealistic optimism about the nature of the zoo industry.
The WZCS estimates that there are about 10,000 zoos in the world, of which around 1,000 represent a core of quality collections capable of participating in coordinated conservation programmes. This is probably the document's first failing, as I believe that 10,000 is a serious underestimate of the total number of places masquerading as zoological establishments. Of course it is difficult to get accurate data but, to put the issue into perspective, I have found that, in a year of working in Eastern Europe, I discover fresh zoos on almost a weekly basis.
The second flaw in the reasoning of the WZCS document is the naive faith it places in its 1,000 core zoos. One would assume that the caliber of these institutions would have been carefully examined, but it appears that the criterion for inclusion on this select list might merely be that the zoo is a member of a zoo federation or association. This might be a good starting point, working on the premise that members must meet certain standards, but again the facts don't support the theory. The greatly respected American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums (AAZPA) has had extremely dubious members, and in the UK the Federation of Zoological Gardens of Great Britain and Ireland has occasionally had members that have been roundly censured in the national press. These include Robin Hill Adventure Park on the Isle Wight, which many considered the most notorious collection of animals in the country. This establishment, which for years was protected by the Isle's local council (which viewed it as a tourist amenity), was finally closed down following a damning report by a veterinary inspector appointed under the terms of the Zoo Licensing Act 1981. As it was always a collection of dubious repute, one is obliged to reflect upon the standards that the Zoo Federation sets when granting membership. The situation is even worse in developing countries where little money is available for redevelopment and it is hard to see a way of incorporating collections into the overall scheme of the WZCS.
Even assuming that the WZCS's 1,000 core zoos are all of a high standard—complete with scientific staff and research facilities, trained and dedicated keepers, accommodation that permits normal or natural behaviour, and a policy of co-operating fully with one another—what might be the potential for conservation? Colin Tudge, author of Last Animals at the Zoo (Oxford University Press, 1992), argues that "if the world's zoos worked together in co-operative breeding programmes, then even without further expansion they could save around 2,000 species of endangered land vertebrates". This seems an extremely optimistic proposition from a man who must be aware of the failing and weaknesses of
A.London Zoo's advertisements are dishonest.
B.Zoos made an insignificant contribution to conservation up until 30 years ago.
C.No one knew how the animals were being treated at Robin Hill Adventure Park.
D.The number of successful zoo conservation programmes is unsatisfactory.
(26)
A.Sandy probably had a skiing accident.
B.Sandy tripled and fell on Tuesday.
C.Sandy is on the last leg of his trip.
D.Sandy is probably skiing today.
M: Yeah Jane, what can I do for you?
W: I was calling about the apple tree that you were trimming yesterday.
M: That was hard work!
W: I'm sure it was. It sure looked difficult.
M: Yeah, I'm glad it's finished. Hauling the branches to the front for garbage pick up was no fun either.
W: Well, I don't think you're quite finished yet, some of the larger branches fell over into my yard, and I think you should come and get them.
M: Listen Jane, I don't see why I should do that. You eat all the apples that fall in your yard and you've never complained about that before.
W: Well, it's easier to pick up apples than to drag tree branches all the way to the curb. My kids pick up the apples, and the branches are just too big for them to drag.
M: Well, I guess you'll just have to do it yourself Jane.
W: Patrick, I wish you would reconsider. We've always gotten along fairly well, but I think you're out of line here. The branches are your responsibility.
M: Sorry Jane, I disagree! You take the benefits of the apple tree, but refuse to deal with the bad side of it! Besides, it won't take you any time to get the branches out front!
W: Get the branches off my property or I'll have to sue you.
M: Yeah? For what?! You're taking those law classes too seriously! I've gotta go, I have to pick up my son.
W: You'll be hearing from me.
M: Yeah, yeah. See you in court Jane.
Q. 27. What did the man do yesterday?
Q. 28.What did the woman ask the man to do?
Q. 29.What did the woman threaten to do?
Q. 30.What was the man's reaction to the woman's threat?
(47)
A.He picked up some apples in his yard.
B.He cut some branches off the apple tree.
C.He quarreled with his neighbor over the fence.
D.He cleaned up all the garbage in the woman's yard.
为了保护您的账号安全,请在“简答题”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!