题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
American employees don't envy the boss who earns much more because
A．they resign themselves to their fate.
B．they have a strong sense of security.
C．they are tolerant as well as generous.
D．they have a fair chance to rise in rank.
简答题官方参考答案
（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
更多“American employees don't envy the boss who earns much more becauseA．they resign themselves”相关的问题
听力原文： Speaker: Well, now that you have all finished your exams and are waiting eagerly—well, perhaps not too eagerly—for the results, it's time for this presentation on "Reverse Culture Shock". Yes, just when you thought you had got over your culture shock in the UK, you arrive home and find yourself going through it all over again! In fact, moving back to your home environment after being away can be more of a culture shock than the UK was. You expect your home to be thoroughly familiar to you, but instead you may find you experience it differently. You will probably re-evaluate your own culture in terms of what you have experienced here.
Here are some of the surprising differences you may notice when you
return home. First, your friends and family may not shareyour new attitudes. Q31
Second, you may have less privacy and independence than you had as a student. Q32
Third, people may be less interested in hearing about your experiences
abroad than you would like. To them, your life in the UK may seem remote
and rather irrelevant. Fourth, other people may be intimidated by your impressive
qualifications, or may envy you your opportunities. Lastly, you may
feel pressure from your family to be successful in your career, and to show Q33
your gratitude for the investment they have made in you.
At work, you may find routines more rigid and disciplined than you have expected, especially after the freedom of being a student. People at work may resist the new ideas and practices you have learned. Your suggestions may seem like major innovations in your home country. There may be changes in your group of family and friends—people may have married and had children, some may have moved away, and new people may have moved into your circle.
The important point to remember is that, just as initial culture shock
is an entirely normal reaction, so is "reverse culture shock". You may go
through the following phases. One. Excitement about going home. Two. Rapidly
changing emotions as you cope with changes and find out how different Q34
reality is from your expectations. Three. Gradual re-acceptance of your home Q35
culture. Finally, a broader perspective in which you can appreciate the value Q36
and limitations of both the cultures you now know.
Here are five ways to reduce reverse culture shock. One. While you are
in the UK, keep in touch with friends and family back home, and with other Q37
people from your own country who are in the UK. Two. Read newspapers
and magazines from your home country so that you know about important
news and developments. Three. Before you leave, get the addresses of the Q38
friends you have made in the UK so you can keep in touch. Four. When you
get home, give yourself time to readjust to life there—and give your friends
and family time to readjust to the new you. The longer you have been away,
the more both you and your home environment will have changed. Five. Stay
in contact with anyone who lives near you and has also studied abroad—
sharing experiences will help a great deal. You can contact your institution's
alumni association and ask them to put you in touch with any former students
who live in your area.
You will recover from reverse culture shock in time, and settle back
into life in your home country. But that does not mean you should sever your
connections with the UK. Your experience here will have provided you with
a network of valuable social, academic and business contacts that you can Q39
carry through the rest of your life. And you will probably—hopefully—find
that you have developed a lasting fondness for the UK and its culture. There
are a number
There is nothing like the suggestion of a cancer risk to scare a parent, especially one of the over-educated, eco-conscious type. So you can imagine the reaction when a recent USA Today investigation of air quality around the nation's schools singled out those in the smugly (自鸣得意地) green village of Berkeley, Calif., as being among the worst in the country. The city's public high school, as well as a number of daycare centers, preschools, elementary and middle schools, fell in the lowest 10%. Industrial pollution in our town had supposedly turned students into living science experiments breathing in a laboratory's worth of heavy metals like manganese, chromium and nickel each day. This in a city that requires school cafeterias to serve organic meals. Great, I thought, organic lunch, toxic campus.
Since December, when the report came out, the mayor, neighborhood activists (活跃分子) and various parent-teacher associations have engaged in a fierce battle over its validity: over the guilt of the steel-casting factory on the western edge of town, over union jobs versus children's health and over what, if anything, ought to be done. With all sides presenting their own experts armed with conflicting scientific studies, whom should parents believe？ Is there truly a threat here, we asked one another as we dropped off our kids, and if so, how great is it？ And how does it compare with the other, seemingly perpetual health scares we confront, like panic over lead in synthetic athletic fields？ Rather than just another weird episode in the town that brought you protesting environmentalists, this latest drama is a trial for how today's parents perceive risk, how we try to keep our kids safe—whether it's possible to keep them safe—in what feels like an increasingly threatening world. It raises the question of what, in our time, "safe" could even mean.
"There's no way around the uncertainty," says Kimberly Thompson, president of Kid Risk, a nonprofit group that studies children's health. "That means your choices can matter, but it also means you aren't going to know if they do." A 2004 report in the journal Pediatrics explained that nervous parents have more to fear from fire, car accidents and drowning than from toxic chemical exposure. To which I say: Well, obviously. But such concrete hazards are beside the point. It's the dangers parents can't—and may never—quantify that occur all of a sudden. That's why I've rid my cupboard of microwave food packed in bags coated with a potential cancer-causing substance, but although I've lived blocks from a major fault line (地质断层) for more than 12 years, I still haven't bolted our bookcases to the living room wall.
A、control
B、stamp
C、data
D、logical
A、chronic infections
B、“pyogenic” bacterial infections
C、actue viral infections
D、mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
A、$965.00 today.
B、$966.18 today.
C、$1000.00 today.
D、$1035.00 today.
Hiring the right employee is a challenging process for a company. A bad hire not just wastes your time and money, but also impacts the team spirit and company morale. A good hire, however, pays you back in employee productivity, successful employment relationship, and business culture enhancement. Here are certain rules that you can use to select the right employee.
Design an effective advertisement. A clearly targeted ad. attracts qualified candidates and discourages others. You can make your ad. More effective with a precise and specific job description.
Ask the right job interview questions. The purpose of the interview is to find out if the candidate is a strong fit to your business. By using a sequence of particularly designed questions, you are able to get a true picture of your potential employee.
Check backgrounds and references. Background checking helps you reduce risks and improve the overall quality of hire. You need to verify that all the presented credentials, skills, and experience are actually possessed by your candidate.
() 26. Hiring the wrong employee is expensive, costly to a company, and time consuming.
() 27. A company has to spend a lot of money hiring a right employee.
() 28. An advertisement with a clear target will make all candidates lose courage.
() 29. Well designed interview questions can help you know more about the candidates.
() 30. Work experience is one of the primary things for an employer to verify in background checking.
A、Market value per share by earnings per share.
B、Earnings per share by market value per share.
C、Dividends per share by earnings per share.
D、Dividends per share by market value per share.
E、Market value per share by dividends per share.
A、9.6.
B、19.2.
C、12.5.
D、10.0.
E、8.5.
警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
