题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
A．their immediate lord
B．the king
C．either their immediate lord or king
D．their immediate lord and the king as well
简答题官方参考答案
（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
更多“One peculiar feature of the feudal system of England was that all landowners took the oath”相关的问题
A.Synonymy
B.Polysemy
C.Homonymy
D.Hyponymy
A、Peculiar fashion design.
B、Made from diverse textile.
C、Elaborate patterns.
D、Made by hand.
A．English only
B．Chinese only
C．all natural languages
D．some natural languages
A.peculiar
B.unique
C.single
D.sterile
At the same time, our understanding of the work of art is in part intellectual; we seek in it a conceptual content, which it presents to us in the form. of an idea. One purpose of critical interpretation is to expound this idea in discursive form--to give the equivalent of the content of the work of art in another, nonsensuous idiom. But criticism can never succeed in this task, for, by separating the content from the particular form, it abolishes its individuality. The content presented then ceases to be the exact content of that work of art. In losing its individuality, the content loses its aesthetic reality; it thus ceases to be a mason for attending to the particular work and that first attracted our critical attention. It cannot be this that we saw in the original work and that explained its power over us.
For this content, displayed in the discursive idiom of the critical intellect, is no more than a husk, a discarded relic of a meaning that eluded us in the act of seizing it. If the content is to be the true object of aesthetic interest, it must remain wedded to its individuality: it cannot be detached from its "sensuous embodiment'' without being detached from itself. Content is, therefore, inseparable from form. and form. in turn inseparable from content. (It is the form. that it is only by virtue of the content that it embodies.)
Hegel' s argument is the archetype of many, all aimed at showing that it is both necessary to distinguish form. from content and also impossible to do so. This paradox may be resolved by rejecting either of its premises, but, as with Kant's antinomy, neither premise seems dispensable. To suppose that content and form. are inseparable is, in effect, to dismiss both ideas as illusory, since no two works of art can then share either a content or a form--the form. being definitive of each work' s individuality.
In this case, no one could ever justify his interest in a work of art by reference to its meaning. The intensity of aesthetic interest becomes a puzzling, and ultimately inexplicable, feature of our mental life. If, on the other hand, we insist that content and form. are separable, we shall never be able to find, through a study of content, the reason for attending to the particular work of art that intrigues us. Every work of art stands proxy for its paraphrase. An impassable gap then opens between aesthetic experience and its ground, and the claim that aesthetic experience is intrinsically valuable is thrown in doubt.
Hegel argued that ______ .
A．it is our sensuous appreciation that gives peculiar individuality to the work of art
B．it is the content of the work of art that holds our attention
C．the work of art cannot be understood without a process of logical thinking
D．the form. of the work of art is what our sensuous appreciation concentrates on
, the interplay of the varied national groups upon one another, and the sheer difficulty of maintaining old-world ways in a raw, new continent caused significant changes.
请将上面这段话翻译成中文，谢谢！
A.Engagement
B.Entitlement
C.Exclusion
D.Elite
A.Insights do not move from users to Apple but the other way around.
B.More than Apple listening to us, it’s us who listen to Apple.
C.It contradicts the conventional management wisdom about innovation.
D.Companies should start their innovation process by getting close to users and observe them using existing products to understand their needs.
警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
