题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
简答题官方参考答案
（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
抱歉！暂无答案，正在努力更新中……
更多“We apply the model to analyze the transient response of system with single I/O.”相关的问题
A、ignore some less important nonlinear factors
B、linearize the nonlinear functions around the working point
C、apply parameter concentration
D、use less function parameters
A.View
B.Size of Room
C.Internet Wifi
D.Light
I suggest we think of ethics as analogous to language usage. There are no univocal rules of gram mar and style. which uniquely determine the best sentence for a particular situation. Nor is language usage universalizable. Although a sentence or phrase is warranted in one case, it does not mean it is automatically appropriate in like circumstances. Nonetheless, language usage is not subjective.
This should not surprise us in the least. All intellectual pursuits are relativistic in just these senses. Political science, psychology, chemistry, and physics are not certain, but they are not subjective either. As I see it, ethical inquiry proceeds like this: we are taught moral principles by parents, teachers, and society at large. As we grow older we become exposed to competing views. These may lead us to reevaluate presently held beliefs. Or we may find ourselves inexplicably making certain valuations, possibly because of inherited altruistic tendencies. We may "learn the hard way" that some actions generate unacceptable consequences. Or we may reflect upon our own and others' "theories" or pat terns of behavior. and decide they are inconsistent. The resulting views are "tested;" we act as we think we should and evaluate the consequences of those actions on ourselves and on others. We thereby correct our mistakes in light of the test of time.
Of course people make different moral judgments; of course we cannot resolve these differences by using some algorithm which is itself beyond judgment. We have no vantage point outside human experience where we can judge right and wrong, good and bad. But then we don't have a vantage point from where we can be philosophical relativists either.
We are left within the real world, trying to cope with ourselves, with each other, with the world, and with our own mistakes. We do not have all the moral answers; nor do we have an algorithm to discern those answers. Neither do we possess an algorithm for determining correct language usage but that does not make us throw up our hands in despair because we can no longer communicate.
If we understand ethics in this way, we can see, I think, the real value of ethical theory. Some people talk as if ethical theories give us moral prescriptions. They think we should apply ethical principles as we would a poultice: after diagnosing the illness, we apply the appropriate dressing. But that is a mistake. No theory provides a set of abstract solutions to apply straightforwardly. Ethical theories are important not because they solve all moral dilemmas but because they help us notice salient features of moral problems and help us understand those problems in context.
Ethics was generally considered to be
A．definite and clear.
B．vague and uncertain.
C．certain but non-rational.
D．relative but not subjective.
I suggest we think of ethics as analogous to language usage. There are no univocal rules of grammar and style. which uniquely determine the best sentence for a particular situation. Nor is language usage universalizable. Although a sentence or phrase is warranted in one case, it does not mean it is automatically appropriate in like circumstances. Nonetheless, language usage is not subjective.
This should not surprise us in the least. All intellectual pursuits are relativistic in just these senses. Political science, psychology, chemistry, and physics are not certain, but they are not subjective either. As I see it, ethnical inquiry proceeds like this: we are taught moral principles by parents, teachers, and society at large. As we grow older we become exposed to competing views. These may lead us to reevaluate presently held beliefs. Or we may find ourselves inexplicably making certain valuations, possibly because of inherited altruistic tendencies. We may "learn the hard way" that some actions generate unacceptable consequences. Or we may reflect upon our own and others' "theories" or patterns of behavior. and decide they are inconsistent. The resulting views are "tested"; we act as we think we should and evaluate the consequences of those actions on ourselves and on others. We thereby correct our mistakes in light of the test of time.
Of course people make different moral judgments; of course we cannot resolve these differences by using some algorithm which is itself beyond judgment. We have no vantage point outside human experience where we can judge right and wrong, good and bad. But then we don't have a vantage point from where we can be philosophical relativists either.
We are left within the real world, trying to cope with ourselves, with each other, with the world, and with our own fallibility. We do not have all the moral answers, nor do we have an algorithm to discern those answers, neither do we possess an algorithm for determining correct language usage but that does not make us throw up our hands in despair because we can no longer communicate.
If we understand ethics in this way, we can see, I think, the real value of ethical theory. Some people talk as if ethical theories give us moral prescriptions. They think we should apply ethical principles as we would a poultice: after diagnosing the ailment, we apply the appropriate dressing. But that is a mistake. No theory provides a set of abstract solutions to apply straightforwardly. Ethical theories are important not because they solve all moral dilemmas but because they help us notice salient features of moral problems and help us understand those problems in context.
Ethical principles are generally thought to be ______.
A．explicitly clear
B．implicitly vague
C．certain but non-rational
D．relative but not subjective
Section D
听力原文： Thank you all very much for coming. I will try to be as brief as possible. As I expect you’ve got your rights on the refreshments set at the back of the room which will be served the minute I finish.
OK. Before I move on to the new model, I just like to say a very warm welcome to our new marketing manager, Jane Seimes, who joined us this month. We are very glad to have her onboard.
Right, well, the regent itself, we started developing the regent as long ago as October 1999, using technology first design for our rally cars. Our engineers have worked extremely hard to bring a truly new car onto the market. Quality is guaranteed, by one of the most up-to-date production lines in the world, equipped with the lasers. They can work to a very high-level of accuracy.
Now, of course, many or most drivers won’t be thinking about that. But I think they will be very grateful for the fact that the regent is extremely economical in terms of running costs. It has the best fuel consumption rate in its class.
A lot of people say that all cars look the same these days. But that does not apply to the regent, with its special styling. And on top of that, it can be ordered in a large number of colors. More than any other car in this press range.
OK, the official launch is next week. Our advertising campaign starts tomorrow. And I' m very excited, because we are putting our main efforts into publicizing the model over the Internet. We feel we can affectively target our campaign in this way. I am very confident that the regent is going to sell very well indeed, and be part of super cars' continuing success. Because it is small and easy to park, I think we will see our best sales in cities.
Well, thank you for your attention. Now, for the refreshments.
SUPACARS PLC
Notes on New Regent Model
Supacars recently appointed a new【21】______.
Development of the Regent began in【22】______using【23】______for rally cars.
Production will use very accurate【24】______.
The car will be very【25】______to run. It has the best【26】______in its class.
A wide range of【27】______will be available.
The【28】______is next week. Advertising will concentrate on【29】______.
Sales are expected to be highest in【30】______.
(21)
All in all, it is quite hard to say whether we should be accepting these new technological advances or whether we should be sticking to the traditional model of sport. We are currently in the middle of both drug use and the use of new and innovative equipment as far as I can tell. Where are we going to progress from here？ Are athletes actually going to put microchips in their brain in order to attain an athletic title？ The future holds many options for the outlook of sport, and it will be interesting to address tradition in sport in the years to come.
What the author discussed in the previous sections is most probably about ______.
A．various performance-improving drugs
B．the development of modern technology
C．innovative equipment in the sports field
D．technological influences on other people
A、we should just use violence directly.
B、we should maximize our own interests.
C、we don’t need communication and talk.
D、we need talk or coordination.
What does the speaker imply？
A．Sometimes we can judge people easily.
B．We cannot judge people theoretically.
C．We cannot judge people financially.
D．We can always apply theory to practice.
7.Let
. Does
exists ？
A、(A) Yes, since
for any
, by pinching theorem,exists.
B、(B) Yes, since
for any, by pinching theorem,exists.
C、(C) No, since there exists somesuch that
and somesuch that, we can't apply pinching theorem.
D、(D) None of above explanation is correct.
警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
