A young woman obtained used items of clothing from yard sales, swap meets and similar sources, and then cleaned and refurbished them before selling them at her small shop. One day, an extremely well-to-do lawyer came into the woman’s shop. The lawyer found nothing of interest in the clothing racks, but she noticed an odd-looking canary-colored raincoat hanging from a hook on the wall. Not realizing that the raincoat belonged to the young woman, the lawyer pointed to the raincoat and said, “I’ll give you $25 for that hideous thing. Besides, you’re far too corporate to wear a coat like that.” The lawyer, now angry herself, replied, “I must have it.” The young woman said, “Okay, it’s yours for $550.” “Done,” said the lawyer. Does an enforceable contract exist between the woman and the lawyer?
A、(A) Yes, because there was a bargained-for-exchange of promises.
B、(B) Yes, because the raincoat was worth $550 to the lawyer.
C、(C) No, because the consideration supporting the woman’s promise is insufficient.
D、(D) No, because the agreement between the parties is unconscionable.