In April 2013, one foreign trade company of China ...
In April 2013, one foreign trade company of China signed a tea export contract with a Canadian importer, requiring a proper packing ,with trade term of CIF Ottawa, covering all risks by PICC. The manufacturer lowered down the humidity of tea to the scale specified in the contract at the last procedure, packed the tea in the containers made of hard paper then in cartons with double layers. The goods were shipped in container and arrived in Ottawa on May 2013. But ,the result of the spection at destination port indicates: all tea has gone off and moldy, the total loss reached one hundred thousand dollars. But ,the temperature and humnidity in the manufacturing place and the import country are modest, the transportation is normal and smooth. Who shall take the responsibility and make compensation for the loss?which are the following analysis correct?
A、The carrier don't take the responsibility,because the transportation is normal
B、The problem is due to the package for the tea cannot meet the requirement of the anti-humidity for common transporataion
C、The main reason is package which occurred before the transportation ,so the manufacturer shall take de responsibility and make compensation for the loss.
D、The loss shall be covered in All Risks, so the premiumer should take the responsibility tof the compensation.