题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
What is Russians attitude towards this reform？
A．Concerned.
B．Optimistic.
C．Pessimistic.
D．Indifferent.
简答题官方参考答案
（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
更多“What is Russians attitude towards this reform？A．Concerned.B．Optimistic.C．Pessimistic.D．Ind”相关的问题
A、They are very polite.
B、They are frank and romantic.
C、Their behavior is usually very different.
D、They are very hospitable.
What statement is true according to the passage？
A．The Aleuts are akin to the Eskimo.
B．The Aleuts are the descendants of the Eskimo.
C．The Russians killed off all the Aleuts.
D．The Aleuts refused to marry any Russian.
A、The Russians attacked the French army.
B、The temperature dropped sharply.
C、The army suffered heavy losses.
D、All of the above.
A、They fought fiercely.
B、They avoided direct fighting.
C、They surrendered after fierce resistance.
D、They tried to negotiate with the enemy.
What is said about the price？
A．It is cheaper for EMA members.
B．There is a discount for attending the whole series.
C．It is different for each workshop.
D．There is a reduced price for group purchases.
According to the letter, what probably happened during Jared O'Connor's interview？
A．He attended a meeting with a client.
B．He was asked to give a presentation.
C．He observed employees doing their jobs.
D．He took a test to demonstrate his technical skills.
They got it. We fed them loans, knowing that much of the money would disappear corruptly. We turned away from atrocity in Chechnya lest we weaken the new Russian state. But most important, we went weak in the knees on missile defense. The prospect of American antiballistic missiles upset the Russians. And upsetting the Russians was something we simply were not to do.
The Russians cannot keep up with American technology. And they fear that an American missile shield will render obsolete their last remnant of greatness: their monster, nuclear-tipped missiles. So they insist that we adhere to a 1972 treaty signed with the defunct Soviet Union that prohibited either side from developing missile defenses. That the treaty is obsolete-it long predates the world of rogue states racing to acquire missile-launched weapons of mass destruction-does not concern the Russians. Withdraw from the treaty, they said, and you have destroyed the "strategic stability" on which the peace of the world depends.
The Clinton Administration took that threat seriously-so seriously that for eight years it equivocated on building an American ABM system. Finally, President Clinton promised to decide by June 2000. Come June, he punted.
Eight years, and no defense. But the bear was content.
Bear contentment was never a high priority for Ronald Reagan. He offered a different model for dealing with the Russians. The 1980s model went by the name of peace through strength. But it was more than that. It was judicious but unapologetic unilateralism. It was willingness-in the face of threats and bluster from foreign adversaries and nervous apprehension from domestic critics-to do what the U.S. needed to do for its own security. Regardless.
It was Reagan who famously proposed a missile shield, and even more famously refused to barter it away at the Reykjavik summit, an event many historians consider the turning point in the cold war. That marked the beginning of the Soviets' definitive realization that they were going to lose the arms race to the U.S.-and that neither threats nor cajoling would dissuade the U.S. from running it.
This decade starts with a return to the unabashed unilateralism of the 1980s. It began last year with a speech by George W. Bush proposing that the U.S. build weapons to meet American needs-and not to accommodate the complaints or gain the agreement of other countries. For 40 years the U.S. would not cut its offensive nuclear missiles except in conjunction with Soviet cuts. Bush's refreshing question was: Why？ We don't need Rnssians cutting our offensive weapons through arms-control treaties. And we don't need Russians telling us whether or not to build defensive weapons.
This was the genesis of the Bush Doctrine, now taking shape as the Administration takes power. Its motto is, we build to suit-ourselves. Accordingly, the President and the Secretary of Defense have been unequivocal about their determination to go ahead with a missile defense.
They staked their claim. And what happened？ Did the sky fall, as the Clinton Russian experts warned？ On the contrary. Convinced at last of American seriousness, the Russians immediately acquiesced. After just one month of Bush, Moscow has come forward with its very own missile-defense plan. The fact that it is not well sketched out and that it is in part designed to split the U.S. off from Europe is beside the point. The Russians have responded, as did the Soviets before them, to American firmness. Faced with reality, they accommodate it.
Who defines reality; there lies the difference between this Administration and the last. Clinton let Russian opposition define reality. Bush, like Reagan, understands that the U.S. can resha
A．the Russians understood that they needed nurturing from their new American friends
B．the Russians knew Americans will surely help them
C．upsetting the Russians was something the Americans simply were not to do
D．the Americans shouldn't worry about upsetting the Russians
Russia's Progress cargo ship will deliver the followings to the orbiting international space station EXCEPT
A．fuel.
B．food.
C．equipment.
D．astronaut.
Twenty-five of the states have Indian names, but other names were taken from different languages. Georgian and Pennsylvania have names which were taken from the Latin language. Florida and Colorado were named for places in England. The two newest states have names which did not come from any of those languages. Hawaii got its name from a word in the Hawaiian language which means "homeland". Alaska was named by the Russians, from whom Alaska was bought in 1867.
What does "Illinois" mean in Indian language？
"Illinois" mean ______.
What is the most appropriate title for the passage？
A．The killing of a Japanese Fisherman
B．Shooting of Japanese Fisherman Triggering Dispute with Russia
C．Japan and Russia Fighting to Gain the Ownership of the Island Chain
D．Japanese Government Lodging a Protest Against Russia
警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
