网友您好，请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目：

搜题

题目内容（请给出正确答案）

提问人：网友dengwenji 发布时间：2022-01-07

[主观题]

Research on animal intelligence always makes me wonder just how smart humans are. 1 the fr

uit-fly experiments described in Carl Zimmer’s piece in the Science Times on Tuesday. Fruit flies who were taught to be smarter than the average fruit fly 2 to live shorter lives. This suggests that 3 bulbs burn longer, that there is an 4 in not being too terrifically bright.

Intelligence, it 5 out, is a high-priced option. It takes more upkeep, burns more fuel and is slow 6 the starting line because it depends on learning — a gradual 7 — instead of instinct. Plenty of other species are able to learn, and one of the things they’ve apparently learned is when to 8 .

Is there an adaptive value to 9 intelligence？ That’s the question behind this new research. I like it. Instead of casting a wistful glance 10 at all the species we’ve left in the dust I.Q.-wise, it implicitly asks what the real 11 of our own intelligence might be. This is 12 the mind of every animal I’ve ever met.

Research on animal intelligence also makes me wonder what experiments animals would 13 on humans if they had the chance. Every cat with an owner, 14 , is running a small-scale study in operant conditioning. we believe that 15 animals ran the labs, they would test us to 16 the limits of our patience, our faithfulness, our memory for terrain. They would try to decide what intelligence in humans is really 17 , not merely how much of it there is. 18 , they would hope to study a 19 question: Are humans actually aware of the world they live in？ 20 the results are inconclusive.

1.______

[A] Suppose [B] Consider [C] Observe [D] Imagine

简答题官方参考答案（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）

查看官方参考答案

更多“Research on animal intelligence always makes me wonder just how smart humans are. 1 the fr”相关的问题

第1题

听力原文： So today were gonna talk about animal experimentation. Do you know why animal

experimentation is scientific fraud？ I am an animal lover. Although I have never personally performed vivisection or experimented on animals, I have many friends and former colleagues who have done so. Almost every single one of these people feel an enormous burden and responsibility to see that the animals suffer as little as possible and that no animal in an experiment loses its life for nothing. Scientists for the most part are not in it for the money or the fame, both of which most scientists NEVER see much of, by the way. They want to help make the world a little better while exercising their innate curiosity. For you to demonize the many scientists who experiment while trying to find cures for diseases is really unfortunate and demonstrates that you are terribly uninformed. Am I saying that human life is more important than animal life？ I am not. Animal experimentation is also performed on animals for the betterment of animal health. Am I saying that all animal experimentation is necessary？ Absolutely not. Some of it is very likely a sad waste of animal lives and the cause of needless suffering, and certainly a waste of limited research funding. Am I saying that some of this work has saved human lives？ Absolutely. Satan Jr.s example (insulin) is one such case. As an animal lover, I will be most pleased when the use of animals in science is no longer performed. Do you really want to help make animal experimentation a memory？ Then become a scientist and develop alternative disease models and non-animal based remedies and then make your research widely available to other scientists. If you had really done your homework and focused on something beyond your anger and hatred, you would, see that many scientists have already done just this. You can also donate time and/or money to organizations that support the development of alternatives to animal testing. Science, like so many other fields, is slow to evolve. It will take time. The great advances in science that have given us the high standard of medical care humans and animals enjoy today have come from clinical observation, in vitro research, epidemiology, autopsies, serendipity, computer and mathematical modeling, technology, tissue research using the tissue from the species being studied, molecular biology and genetics, post-marketing drug surveillance, the basic sciences of maths, chemistry and physics and the specialization of medical care, including the specialization of physicians and veterinarians. The animal experimentation lobby, however, spends millions annually to convince the public that all medical advances are directly due to animal experiments. Furthermore, animals are not able to communicate about any side effects they may be experiencing. At least half of the side effects experienced by most drugs cannot be accurately communicated by animals. In April 1998, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported on a study which showed that more than 2 million Americans become seriously ill every year because of toxic reactions to correctly prescribed medicine and 106000 die from those reactions, making drug side effects the sixth most common cause of death in this country! Legal drugs kill more people per year than all illegal drugs combined. People expect me and want me to argue against vivisection on a purely scientific basis. I can do that. However, I cannot and will not forgo the ethical argument. For when all is said and done, I believe that research on animals is ethically wrong, and that nothing "good" can ever come out of something so morally debased. I often cite the hypothermia experiments done on Jews in the concentration camps during World War Ⅱ. This experimentation on helpless, non-consenting humans who suffered and died as a result of these experiments actually taught scientists a great deal about treating hypothermia in humans. But was it right？ I would argue that it was absolutely wrong, no matter how much useful information we garnered.Narrator Listen to part of a lecture in a biology class. Now get ready to answer the questions. You may use your notes to help you answer.

What aspect of animal experimentation does the professor mainly discuss？

A．How harmful it is to animal protection.

B．How useless it is for the medical care.

C．How its development differs from that of others,

D．How it develops from an early ag

点击查看答案

第2题

听力原文：Narrator Listen to part of a lecture in a biology class. Professor So today w

ere gonna talk about animal experimentation. Do you know why animal experimentation is scientific fraud？ I am an animal lover. Although I have never personally performed vivisection or experimented on animals, I have many friends and former colleagues who have done so. Almost every single one of these people feel an enormous burden and responsibility to see that the animals suffer as little as possible and that no animal in an experiment loses its life for nothing. Scientists for the most part are not in it for the money or the fame, both of which most scientists NEVER see much of, by the way. They want to help make the world a little better while exercising their innate curiosity. For you to demonize the many scientists who experiment while trying to find cures for diseases is really unfortunate and demonstrates that you are terribly uninformed. Am I saying that human life is more important than animal life？ I am not. Animal experimentation is also performed on animals for the betterment of animal health. Am I saying that all animal experimentation is necessary？ Absolutely not. Some of it is very likely a sad waste of animal lives and the cause of needless suffering, and certainly a waste of limited research funding. Am I saying that some of this work has saved human lives？ Absolutely. Satan Jr.s example(insulin)is one such case. As an animal lover, I will be most pleased when the use of animals in science is no longer performed. Do you really want to help make animal experimentation a memory？ Then become a scientist and develop alternative disease models and non-animal based remedies and then make your research widely available to other scientists. If you had really done your homework and focused on something beyond your anger and hatred, you would see that many scientists have already done just this. You can also donate time and/or money to organizations that support the development of alternatives to animal testing. Science, like so many other fields, is slow to evolve. It will take time. The great advances in science that have given us the high standard of medical care humans and animals enjoy today have come from clinical observation, in vitro research, epidemiology, autopsies, serendipity, computer and mathematical modeling, technology, tissue research using the tissue from the species being studied, molecular biology and genetics, post-marketing drug surveillance, the basic sciences of maths, chemistry and physics and the specialization of medical care, including the specialization of physicians and veterinarians. The animal experimentation lobby, however, spends millions annually to convince the public that all medical advances are directly due to animal experiments. Furthermore, animals are not able to communicate about any side effects they may be experiencing. At least half of the side effects experienced by most drugs cannot be accurately communicated by animals. In April 1998, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported on a study which showed that more than 2 million Americans become seriously ill every year because of toxic reactions to correctly prescribed medicine and 106 000 die from those reactions, making drug side effects the sixth most common cause of death in this country! Legal drugs kill more people per year than all illegal drugs combined. People expect me and want me to argue against vivisection on a purely scientific basis. I can do that. However, I cannot and will not forgo the ethical argument. For when all is said and done, I believe that research on animals is ethically wrong, and that nothing "good" can ever come out of something so morally debased. I often cite the hypothermia experiments done on Jews in the concentration camps during World War II. This experimentation on helpless, non-consenting humans who suffered and died as a result of these experiments actually taught scientists a great deal about treating hypothermia in humans. But was it right？ I would argue that it was absolutely wrong, no matter how much useful information we garnered. Now get ready to answer the questions. You may use your notes to help you answer. 18. What aspect of animal experimentation does the professor mainly discuss？ 19. What does the professor say about animal experimentation？ 20. What is the evidence to deny animal experimentation？ Listen again to part of the lecture. Then answer the question. Professor Do you really want to help make animal experimentation a memory？ Then become a scientist and develop alternative disease models and non-animal based remedies and then make your research widely available to other scientists. 21. What does the professor imply when he says this？ Professor Do you really want to help make animal experimentation a memory？ 22. Why does the professor say this？ Professor For when all is said and done, I believe that research on animals is ethically wrong, and that nothing "good" can ever come out of something so morally debased. 23. How does the professor remind students of the cruelness of animal experimentation？Narrator Listen to part of a lecture in a biology class. Now get ready to answer the questions. You may use your notes to help you answer.

What aspect of animal experimentation does the professor mainly discuss？

A．How harmful it is to use animals in experiments.

B．How useless it is to use animals for medical treament.

C．How fast is animal experimentation developed in recent years.

D．How is animal experimentation different from other kinds of experimetation.

点击查看答案

第3题

As an animal doctor and someone who has spent three decades on biomedical research, I

know that animal research saves lives. I am concerned about deceptive claims from anima rights activists about the need for animal research. As we know, animal studies continue to be necessary for advancing human and animal health and have played a vital role in every major medical advance. This includes lifesaving drugs, vaccines (疫苗), new surgical procedures, and improved diagnosis of disease.Animal activists try to deceive people and count on society’s general lack of scientific insight to advance their agendA.These activists misrepresent the ability of computers and emerging scientific techniques to serve as substitutes for animal studies. Government regulations around the world require that new drugs, vaccines, and surgical implants first be tested in animals for potential reactions to poisonous substances. Beyond these formal legal requirements, research into the root causes of disease and how diseases become resistant to current treatments cannot be simulated by computer programs or imitated in test tubes.Although present-day technology cannot yet replace many types of animal research, the research community is committed to finding new ways to reduce and replace animal testing. Animal studies are time-consuming and resource-intensive. If meaningful alternatives exist, companies can save hundreds of millions of dollars in facilities and personnel costs. Concern about animal welfare can take very different forms. Some people are offended by the use of leather and fur as fashion but accept that medical research must unavoidably use animals until alternatives are founD.Some groups argue persuasively against intensive farming practices but, again, recognize the need for animals in medical research.My advice is that people carefully consider not just whether or not a group shares their beliefs, but whether or not they behave morally. The strategies used by opponents have included false claims about alternatives to animal testing and misinformation aimed at provoking community concerns about potential disasters. Fortunately, very few people support such extreme views. Surveys show that most Americans support the need for animal studies aimed at medical advances. There is agreement on one key issue: We all look forward to a day when mankind’s wisdom provides a way to completely eliminate the need for animal studies.

21)Why is the author concerned about claims from animal rights activists？ A.The claims will arrest the development of animal research.

B.The claims will make the public believe something untrue.

C.Medical advancement will slow down.

D.Animal rights activists will play an important role.

22)What do animal rights activists say wrong about animal research？

A.Government regulations around the worlD.

B.The advances of new drugs, vaccines and surgical implants.

C.The causes of disease and its resistance to the current treatment.

D.The ability of computers and emerging scientific techniques.

23)What is the animal research community trying to do？

A.Find new ways to reduce and replace animal testing.

B.Further commit themselves to animal research.

C.Criticize animal rights activists’ deceptive claims.

D.Help companies to save a lot of money and costs.

24)Different forms of the concern about animal welfare tell us ________.

A.fewer people are interested in animal research

B.fewer people care about animal rights to live

C.more people support animal research

D.more people are against intensive farming practices

25)Based on the reading, we can see the author is ________.

A.an animal right activist

B.someone who cares about animals

C.arguing for animal studies

D.arguing for alternatives to animal testing

点击查看答案

第4题

To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, "all that is needed for the triumph of

a misguided cause is that good people do nothing." One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights, movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.

For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animals — no meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied, "Then I would have to say yes." Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, "Don't worry, scientists will find some way of using computers." Such well-meaning people just don't understand.

Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way — in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother's hip replacement, a father's bypass operation, a baby's vaccinations, and even a pet's shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as mew treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.

Much can be done. Scientists could "adopt" middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and ac- quire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research com- munity should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing, there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry Will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.

The author begins his article with Edmund Burke's words to ______.

A．call on scientists to take some actions

B．criticize the misguided cause of animal rights

C．warn of the doom of biomedical research

D．show the triumph of the animal rights movement

点击查看答案

第5题

Text 2 To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke,“all that is needed for the trium

ph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing.”One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal. For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied,“Then I would have to say yes.”Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said,“Don’t worry, scientists will find some way of using computers.”Such well-meaning people just don's understand. Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way-in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother's hip replacement, a father's bypass operation a baby's vaccinations, and even a pet's shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.Much can be done. Scientists could“adopt”middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.

第46题：The author begins his article with Edmund Burke\'s words to

A. call on scientists to take some actions.

B. criticize the misguided cause of animal rights.

C. warn of the doom of biomedical research.

D. show the triumph of the animal rights movement.

点击查看答案

第6题

To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, "all that is needed for the triumph of

a misguided cause is that good people do nothing". One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have tights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal tights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care re search. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.

For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers net to use anything that comes from or is tested in animals—no meat, no fur, no medicines. Ask if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she re plied, "Then I would have to say yes". Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, "Don't worry, scientists will find some way of using computers". Such well-meaning people just don't understand.

Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way—in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother's hip replacement, a father's bypass operation a baby's vaccinations, and even a pet's shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal re search seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.

Much can be done. Scientists could" adopt" middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal re search, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.

The author begins his article with Edmund Burke's words to ______.

A．call on scientists to take some actions

B．criticize the misguided cause of animal rights

C．warn of the doom of biomedical research

D．show the triumph of the animal rights movement

点击查看答案

第7题

阅读理解：根据文章内容，判断正误。MY VOLUNTEERING EXPERIENCEMy volunteer work helps me grow

阅读理解：根据文章内容，判断正误。

MY VOLUNTEERING EXPERIENCE

My volunteer work helps me grow up. It has made me more aware of the difficulties other people go through and made me appreciate the simple things we have in life. It enables me, as an adult, to become more confident and to realize the difference I can make.

I now have new career aspirations and the confidence to take forward these new ideas, since I started mentoring at the Open University and gained experience of working with young students. I'll go on to do a teaching assistant course and looking to go into volunteering teaching or youth work in the future.

My research project will be to build a spatial web application. It was inspired by the volunteering I do for another not-for-profit organization.

My volunteering at an animal shelter is neither connected to my studies nor to my career interests. I do it purely for pleasure, satisfaction and the feeling that I can help somebody. It's made me a happier person, and I wouldn't have got this far at university without it.

操作提示：正确选T，错误选F。

1. Volunteer work makes me become more confident.{T; F}

2. I work with other young volunteers in the Open University.{T; F}

3. My research is related with volunteering I do for another not-for-profit organization.{T; F}

4. My volunteering at an animal shelter enables me to feel satisfactory.{T; F}

5. Without the volunteering work, I wouldn't have my new career as a teacher.{T; F}

点击查看答案

第8题

Some scientists are thinking twice about doing or reporting certain research, reacting to

political and social controversy in addition to legal restrictions. "It appears that controversy shapes what scientists choose to study and how they choose to study it, and we need to look a little bit more closely at the effects it might, be having," said Joanna Kempner, a researcher at the University of Michigan.

Kempner and coauthors from Brown University and the University of Pennsylvania conducted in-depth interviews with 41 scientists engaged in a variety of studies. They found that half felt con-strained by formal limits, but even more said they were affected by informal or unspoken rules on what and how studies can be done. Their findings are reported in Thursday's issue of the journal Science, in a paper entitled "Forbidden Knowledge." Formal limits include such things as the ban on federal funding for most research on embryonic stem cells and restrictions on research involving humans. In many cases, too, scientific journals have their own rules, such as refusing to publish material they think might be detrimental to national security.

But there also are fears about the ire of interest groups, such as opponents of animal testing, or about how a project would be perceived by the public. While formal and informal restrictions on re-search are not unusual, Deborah G. Johnson of the University of Virginia said they are not necessarily all bad. "On the one hand, you want a profession to have norms and to have some standards and some self-regulation. On the other hand, you don't want there to be an environment of fear of repercussions if they do something which they think is legitimate," said Johnson, who has studied similar issues but was not part of Kempner's group.

One researcher, commenting on avoiding controversial work, told Kempner's team: "I would like to lunatic-proof my life as much as possible." Militant animal rights groups were a concern for many, who worded about organizations that have invaded laboratories to set animals loose and destroy research. Kempner recalled one of her interviews. "All of a sudden he said, 'How do I know you're not from an animal rights organization collecting information to storm the place？'"

Sometimes commercial interests can get in the way of research, Kempner added, saying there are cases when the pharmaceutical industry will ask a researcher not to publish a particular finding.

According to the passage, why some scientists are thinking twice about doing or reporting their research？

A．Because they are lack of fund.

B．Because they have to share the honor with others.

C．Because their research may arouse Controversy.

D．Because the government bans them from publishing the results of their research.

点击查看答案

第9题

I was 13 when Benji came into our lives. With his deep brown eyes, floppy ears and cheerfu

l disposition, he was my constant companion throughout my teenage years. We would play together in the garden, and take long walks over the hills behind the house and being a dog, he seemed to have a sympathy for my problems that went deeper than words could express. He was my best friend.

Benji left us about 15 years ago for that great kennel in the sky. But recently I've been thinking about him a lot. Was he really conscious？ Could any animal have consciousness like we do？ Does it matter whether animals are conscious or not？

For many, it is a matter of life and death. On the one hand, animal research has helped prevent some of the most pressing human diseases, including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, "mad cow" disease, malaria, cystic fibrosis and emphysema. On the other hand, this research is performed largely on chimps, our closest nonhuman relatives, with whom we share 98.4% of our genetic material, and great apes, with whom we are similarly biologically close.

Some people feel this connection is strong enough to warrant special treatment. An international group called the Great Ape Project is lobbying the United Nations to adopt a declaration on the rights of great apes modeled on the UN declaration On the Rights of Man. The group believes that apes are "conscious" and so deserve legal protection of their right to life and freedom from imprisonment and torture.

If great apes were shown to have consciousness or something like our own, I would consider it among the scientific discoveries of the century. I would then agree with the Australian philosopher and founder of the animal rights movement, Peter Singer, that per forming medical experiments on chimps would be like experimenting on orphan children. That's a pretty chilling thought, and no amount of' human suffering saved could justify such an action. But before we close down the laboratories and stop searching for a vaccine against AIDS, we had better take a long hard look at the evidence for ape consciousness.

Why does the author bring up the example of Benji？

A．To show that animals have consciousness.

B．To raise the question of animal consciousness.

C．Because Benji was his best friend.

D．To illustrate the differences between dogs and chimps.

点击查看答案

第10题

I was 13 when Benji came into our lives. With his deep brown eyes, floppy cars and cheerfu

l disposition, he was my constant companion throughout my teenage years. We would play together in the garden, and take long walks over the hills behind the house and on the beach. Benji would hang on my every word with his head tilted to one side. Despite being a dog, he seemed to have a sympathy for my problems that went deeper than words could express. He was my best friend.

If great apes were shown to have consciousness or something like our own, I would consider it among the scientific discoveries of the century. I would then agree with the Australian philosopher and founder of the animal rights movement, Peter Singer, that performing medical experiments on chimps would be like experimenting on orphan children. That's a pretty chilling thought, and no amount of human suffering saved could justify such an action. But before we close down the laboratories and stop searching for a vaccine against AIDS, we had better take a long hard look at the evidence for ape consciousness.

Why does the author bring up the example of Benji？

A．To show that animals have consciousness.

B．To raise the question of animal consciousness.

C．Because Benji was his best friend.

D．To illustrate the differences between dogs and chimps.

点击查看答案

账号：尚未登录

登录没有账号？去注册

搜题记录

联系客服

购买搜题卡

考试指南全部 >

如何查询自己的档案存在哪里？1分钟看懂！ 2024年医学类专业成人高考报考具体要求有哪些？ 24上半年江西自学考试成绩查询步骤解析 2024年10月参加四川自考的条件及最全流程是什么 2024年成人高考的科目有哪些专升本报考湖南成考如何复习及2024年湖南成人高考答题技巧 24上半年青海自考成绩查询入口官网详解 2024年大专自考条件及要求是什么 2024年黑龙江成人高考考试科目湖南成考如何调整考试心态？及湖南成考2024年考试范围

购买搜题卡查看答案

购买前请仔细阅读《购买须知》

请选择支付方式

微信支付

支付宝支付

点击支付即表示你同意并接受《服务协议》和《购买须知》

立即支付已付款，但不能查看答案，请点这里登录即可>>

搜题卡使用说明

1. 搜题次数扣减规则：

功能	扣减规则
功能	基础费（查看答案）	加收费（AI功能）
文字搜题、查看答案	1/每题	0/每次
语音搜题、查看答案	1/每题	2/每次
单题拍照识别、查看答案	1/每题	2/每次
整页拍照识别、查看答案	1/每题	5/每次