题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
Now the interviewee's clients are mainly from
A．Shanghai.
B．Shenzhen.
C．Beijing
简答题官方参考答案
（由简答题聘请的专业题库老师提供的解答）
更多“Now the interviewee's clients are mainly fromA．Shanghai.B．Shenzhen.C．Beijing”相关的问题
A.I literally can’t stop.
B.But now I don’t need to worry any more.
C.You’re known as the first billionaire author here.
D.But that’s not just about money.
Interviewer: You have published six popular books. 7___________
Interviewee: Yeah.
Interviewer: So how has being the first billionaire author affected your perception of yourself？
Interviewee: I dress better. Well, you can definitely afford better clothes. 8___________I think the single biggest thing that money gave me--and obviously I came from a place where I was a single mother and it really was hand to mouth at one point. It was literally as poor as you can get without being homeless at one point. 9___________ Never.
Interviewer: Are you in a place now where you can accept that you will always be rich？
Interviewee: No.
Interviewer: And will you be writing more？
Interviewee: Oh, definitely. I can’t, yeah, 10___________ Well, I mean, you could tie my hands to my sides, I suppose, but I have to write. For my own mental health, I need to write.
7、___________
8___________
9___________
10___________
请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！
B.But now I don’t need to worry any more.
C.You’re known as the first billionaire author here.
D.But that’s not just about money.
Interviewer: You have published six popular books. 7___________
Interviewee: Yeah.
Interviewer: So how has being the first billionaire author affected your perception of yourself？
Interviewee: I dress better. Well, you can definitely afford better clothes. 8___________I think the single biggest thing that money gave me--and obviously I came from a place where I was a single mother and it really was hand to mouth at one point. It was literally as poor as you can get without being homeless at one point. 9___________ Never.
Interviewer: Are you in a place now where you can accept that you will always be rich？
Interviewee: No.
Interviewer: And will you be writing more？
Interviewee: Oh, definitely. I can’t, yeah, 10___________ Well, I mean, you could tie my hands to my sides, I suppose, but I have to write. For my own mental health, I need to write.
7、___________
8___________
9___________
10___________
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：INTERVIEWER: On the matter of employer-employee relations, we read a lot and hear a lot about uh...union problems and strikes…
INTERVIEWEE: Well, I think that-.-probably, the-.-oh--speaking of it from an employers standpoint, the easiest thing for an employer to do would be to join a union. Now this might seem...
INTERVIEWER: From an employer's…oh…
INTERVIEWEE: From an employer's standpoint. The reason is that you have the security of never having to worry about having employees. Uh…you'd be meeting a…
INTERVIEWER: Oh-huh…
INTERVIEWEE: a certain criterion because the unions set the criteria for the people that work--their salaries, their fringe benefits, and so on.
INTERVIEWER. And you...you probably have one outfit to deal with, rather than--
INTERVIEWEE: That's correct. So you--From the employee' standpoint, of course, you have the problem that the employee is…is a captive to a set of criteria…
INTERVIEWER: Uh-hum.
INTERVIEWEE:…and his freedom is greatly reduced because of the fact that..-that his bargaining agent is someone else—it’s not himself.
INTERVIEWER. He's no longer in an individual-to-employer situation…
INTERVIEWEE: That is correct.
INTERVIEWER: Is it a trade-off…oh…to a certain extent？ I mean, oh…
INTERVIEWEE: Well my feeling is…one of the nice things about working for a small business which is non-union, you have a higher degree of freedom. And that it's much easier from the employees standpoint…uh…to be able to negotiate one-to-one, than to work through a shop steward, or…or a union agent that tells you what you're going to do…
INTERVIEWER: Uh-huh…
INTERVIEWEE: And so…uh…that's one of the great advantages of a small business--because most of them are non-union, and they have survived in the country...
INTERVIEWER: Un-hm…
INTERVIEWEE:…and…and it's those people that are really independent that have made this country go. But when you become a captive to any big organization--whether it's a corporation, a union or a government--you just absolutely lose your freedom.
The interviewee believes that having all union employees is the ______way of operating from an employer's point of view.
A．simplest
B．most difficult
C．most tedious
D．least desirable
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：INTERVIEWER: I'm going to talk to you now about the suffragette movement. Were you yourself ever a suffragette？
INTERVIEWEE: No, I did not approve of suffragettes. I did not want to have the vote. I felt the man of the house should be in charge of that section. And the woman, of course, to look after the home and children. I thought that voting was unnecessary, at that time.
INTERVIEWER: What was your attitude at the time when the suffragettes were being militant？
INTERVIEWEE: Oh, I was very much against them. I'd be highly insulted if anybody called me a suffragette.
INTERVIEWER: Do you think it would matter very much if women didn't, hadn't achieved the vote, if they hadn't got the vote at all and still didn't have it？
INTERVIEWEE: I don't think it would've made a great deal of difference, no, but there are certain things Members of Parliament have done that have been very useful in helping women in their jobs, in other vocations. I think it's good that it had happened. But I wish it had happened a little bit more peacefully, perhaps.
INTERVIEWER: What sort of things can you remember, what other sorts of demonstrations do you remember？
INTERVIEWEE: Marching, they were marching. But of course those were much more peaceful days, nobody interfered with their marches. There were a few boos here and there and a lot of clapping.
INTERVIEWER: Did you actually know any suffragettes yourself？
INTERVIEWEE: Well, my friends, my close friends were. And we used to have great arguments and I used to say I didn't want the vote.
INTERVIEWER: How did they react to that？
INTERVIEWEE: They didn't like that. They said I ought to join the movement.
INTERVIEWER: You've done so many things that in your day were probably the exclusive preserve of man.
INTERVIEWEE: Well, yes. But voting didn't make any difference because that's a political thing. I don't care about women entering into politics particularly.
INTERVIEWER: So you don't mind actually joining men in their world of work but you're happy to leave politics to them.
INTERVIEWEE: Right. I would rather really leave politics to them.
A suffragette is a person who______.
A．fights against racial discrimination
B．fights for women's right of voting
C．participates in a demonstration against government
D．is against women entering into politics
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：Interviewer: Mrs. Sutter, is there a need to control population only in countries like India, Africa, Brazil, those countries that we call the underdeveloped countries or is there a case for limiting population in Europe, for instance？
Interviewee: The reason One would have to limit population is because you are running out of food and you are running out of resources. The people in Europe and America consume a far greater proportion of the world's resources and the world's food than they do in India. So, population is directly related to consumption and your general impact on the environment.
Interviewer: Do you mean that if as an individual your impact is far greater than anybody else's, then that is the factor that is important, rather than how many people there are, or how many people can the world support？
Interviewee: Exactly. Now obviously in that sense, it is possible to increase population if everybody is willing to use less material or eat less food, but this doesn't seem to be the trend at the moment.
Interviewer: But the world can produce more to meet the needs.
Interviewee: The problem is that the underdeveloped areas try and develop more material benefits, but as soon as they do this, the population increase has wiped out any benefit they may have achieved.
Interviewer: But do you feel that this battle with a rapidly expanding population can be won？
Interviewee: The most sensible thing is to realize that you can't go on expanding human populations forever and countries and individuals must decide to have a policy which would limit population.
Interviewer: What section of the population do you think free birth control techniques should be available to？
Interviewee: They should be available to all sections of the community. Since things are getting to such a pitch that I personally think that not only should birth control methods be available to all sections of the community, but indeed should be compulsory. There should be acme kind of law which says that a family should not have more than three children, a complete maximum of three children, If they have three children then they must be obliged by law to use birth control.
Interviewer: But surely this is very explosive in social terms.
Interviewee: It's a very totalitarian motion. But if we look around us in the world we can see millions of people are starving to death in places like India, and people suffering from malnutrition in other parts of the underdeveloped world and indeed even in parts of the so-called developed world.
According to the interviewee Mrs, Sutter, the mason for limiting population is that ______.
A．population is directly related to consuming food and other resources which are being run out
B．underdeveloped countries have great problems in increasing productivity to produce more materials
C．people are destroying living environment
D．there is less space for people to live in
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：INTERVIEWER: You're an expert on the urban problem, Mr. Cross. I wonder how you would describe the characteristics of these enormous cities which have sprung up in Asia and Latin America？
INTERVIEWEE: The first point to make is that they are different from large cities in Europe and America.
INTERVIEWER: Surely all large cities are essentially similar.
INTERVIEWEE: It's true that in all large cities there are the same problems of provision of housing and services, but the difference lies in the time factor.
INTERVIEWER: I know some of the cities we are considering are just as old and, in some cases, much older than cities in the United States, for instance.
INTERVIEWEE: Very true, but the large cities of Europe and the United States grew relatively slowly. London had u population of mom than a million at the beginning of the nineteenth century and this number grew for more than a hundred years until it reached its maximum of more than eight million. And this growth was parallel to industrial growth throughout the country. The same is true of New York, for example.
INTERVIEWER: But this in not true of Mexico city or Buenos Aires？
INTERVIEWEE: No, it is not. Throughout Latin America and in parts of Asia, cities have grown much faster than industry, or agriculture for that matter. Some of these cities have quadrupled in size in less than two decades, while industrial growth over the same period may only have reached thirty or forty percent.
INTERVIEWER: What does this mean？
INTERVIEWEE: Essentially that population growth of the employed are out of step. Much of the increase is due to immigration from the land, a movement of people in search of better conditions.
INTERVIEWER: And many fail to find jobs？
INTERVIEWEE: Most find some kind of employment but few find jobs in industry. The greater number are sub-employed, many doing casual jobs such as cleaning cars for tips.
INTERVIEWER: Why can't industry absorb them？
INTERVIEWEE: There are a number of reasons. Law educational standards and lack of training are one reason. The nature of so much modem industry is another.
INTERVIEWER: You mean the kind of jobs industry can offer？
INTERVIEWEE: Much industry today is capital intensive, not labor intensive. An automated factory or plant may produce a great deal but employ few workers.
INTERVIEWER: Are there other causes of growth in these cities？
INTERVIEWEE: Well, we must set the cities and their growth against a background of rising birthrates and falling mortality rates, and these, of course, are closely related to rising standards of public health.
INTERVIEWER: So it seems no easy solution to the problem of these gigantic cities now.
INTERVIEWEE: No.
This interview is mainly about______.
A．large cities in Europe and the United States
B．large cities in Latin America
C．industrial development in Latin America
D．industrial development in developed countries
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：INTERVIEWER: Mr. Cobble, I believe you are the Chairman of the Noise Abatement Society. Could you tell us some of the aims of your society？
INTERVIEWEE: Well, our sole purpose is to eliminate all excessive and unnecessary noise from all sources.
INTERVIEWER: Is there any particular source of noise that you are concerned with or that you are fighting against, for example, industrial noise or traffic noise？
INTERVIEWEE: Well, there are about a hundred and one different sources of noise and we get complaints about every one of them, at one time or another. And we deal with about 20,000 complaints a year. There are worse sources of noise, of course. I would say that the one that affects most people in most countries is traffic noise. Air craft noise is worse in intensity, but it affects only about 10% of the population.
INTERVIEWER: Yes, the obvious example is of course Concord, which we're all reading about.
INTERVIEWEE: I don't think Concord will go into production as such, not for environmental reasons, although we have been fighting it tooth and nail in many countries, but for economic reasons.
INTERVIEWER: Is there anything that private people can do about noise or is it something that has of necessity to be dealt with by the governments or by the authorities？
INTERVIEWEE: We got the Noise Abatement Act through Parliament. So it is possible, under this law, for any individual to go to his Public Health Department and complain about any noise. If the Public Health Inspector, on investigating, agrees with the complaint that the noise is a nuisance, he is bound under the terms of the Act, to advise his council to issue an abatement notice. There are two exceptions to this—aircraft noise is above the law, for certain political reasons, and traffic noise, which is dealt with by the police.
INTERVIEWER: We know in fact that people in Britain have become noise-conscious to quite a considerable extent. What about other countries？
INTERVIEWEE: We have an international association against noise, with headquartes in Zurich, and we have conferences in many countries. I would say that possibly at any time of the year there is a noise abatement conference being convened at one or another country throughout the world.
INTERVIEWER: Can I ask you, on a more personal note, what sort of noises you dislike most ？
INTERVIEWEE: I think motorcycles, because young people arc liable to rip up the traffic lights or when you are peacefully driving along in your quiet car, they zoom past you and almost turn you off the read.
INTERVIEWER: Are there any sorts of noise that you enjoy？
INTERVIEWEE: Yes. I like the crackling of my grandchildren. You know, if it's your child, it's a pleasant sound, if it is somebody else's, it's noise.
This interview mainly talks about ______.
A．eliminating all excessive and unnecessary noise
B．where industrial noise comes from
C．how to protect yourselves from being hurt by noise
D．how to complain when you suffer traffic noise
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：INTERVIEWER: What do Eastern and Western family education share in shaping a child's mind and character？
INTERVIEWEE: Parental guidance is probably the first thing. Both the east and the west emphasize the quality of family life. A child very often imitates time parents and he is likely to regard whatever the parents do as positive.
INTERVIEWER: Parents sometimes have moments of embarrassment with their children, for example, what do you think is the most reasonable way of answering children's questions such as how they were born and why their parents sleep together while putting them in their own rooms？
INTERVIEWEE: In America because we have so many different religions and cultures that at present everybody has their own taboos and about what to do. Every family and culture has its own definition of sexual morality. Some parents are very frank, they'll tell the child from a very early age when they start questioning about sex.
INTERVIEWER: How is sex education conducted in a typical American school？
INTERVIEWEE: In primary school education we leave the parents to handle that. By the time of junior high school when their bodies are changing, they have the health classes or PE classes. You have the boys and girls over and they are going to talk about the physical changes. And by the time they go to high school, they have a health class, which talks about sexual problems and diseases.
INTERVIEWER: Another difference between Eastern and Western education is that the Asian teaching method is much more test-oriented. How many national tests do you have or do you have national tests for entering universities？
INTERVIEWEE: There are two national exams for entering college: the SAT and the ACT. But we have to emphasize here that theses exams are optional. They are not required by every school in America, and in fact most state schools don't require them at all if you live in the United States. So when you're at your last year of high school, the question is "Do you want to go to college？"
INTERVIEWER: It seems that they don't have as much pressure as the students in China.
INTERVIEWEE: Right. We give students more room to grow as learners. They know that the exams are important but they don't decide who you am and what kind of student you are. I think that is one of the biggest differences between Chinese education and American education.
INTERVIEWER: Asian students usually score the highest in math and science in the world. What comments do you have on this？
INTERVIEWEE: There has been a saying in many top American universities lately: "If you see so many Asian faces in your class on the first day of the semester, drop it out". I think in a way this is a good summary for the excellent academic performance of Asian students. But at the same time, we have to admit that Asian students do not do an equally good job in their laboratories. I think this is partly because too much emphasis has been placed on test results instead of their ability of using their hands. INTERVIEWER: Now the last question before we end this interview. What should we as parents and teachers do to make children be more creative and innovative？
INTERVIEWEE: I think we should have more discussion classes, both at the primary and secondary levels. We should take the time to make the child be interested in the world around them and question everything they know and to seek their own truth as well, but at the same time, be a guide that can show them how to find the answers themselves.
What does this interview mainly talk about？
A．Similarities in Eastern and Western education systems.
B．Differences in Eastern and Western education systems.
C．Sexual morality in Eastern and Western education systems.
D．Teaching method in Eastern and Western education systems.
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：Interviewee: Everybody always has this misconception that female policemen don't do the same thing as men do, you know. I've worked...
Interviewer: That's not true？
Interviewee: That's not true! I've worked my share of graveyard shifts, and you' know, split shifts, and double-backs and no days off, and...
Interviewer: Uh-huh...
Interviewee: ...as much as the next guy. And... go to...There's no distinction used if there's a male or female officer on duty. Two men on duty--I'll refer to as two men, because in my field there's no difference between the genders. We' re still the same. Okay .... if there's two men on duty--just because one's a female, she still gets in on the same type call. If there's a bar disturbance downtown, then we go too. There's been many times where being the only officer on duty. It's just me and whoever else is on duty in the country. They can come back me up if I need assistance. And it does get a little hairy. You go in there, and you have these great big, huge monster--guys, and they're just drunker than skunks, ... and can't see three feet in front of them. And when they see you, they see fifteen people, and you know.., but still there's enough...
Interviewer: That's where the uniform. is important, I should imagine...
Interviewee: Sometimes,... you know. If somebody is going to-- or has a bad day, and they are out to get a cop, you know, it doesn't matter if you're.., you know,.., boy, girl, infant or anything! When you've got that cop uniform. on, they'll still take it out on you.
Interviewer: Yeah...
Interviewee: But I think there's one advantage to being a female police officer. And that is the fact that most men still have a little respect, and they won't smack you as easy as they would one of the guys.
Interviewer: Uh-huh...
Interviewee: But I'll tell you one thing. I've learned--I'd rather deal with ten drunk men than one drunk woman any day of the week !
Interviewer: Well, why is that...？
Interviewee: Because women are so unpredictable. You cannot ever predict what a woman's going to do.
Interviewer: Hmm...
Interviewee: Especially, if she's agitated, you know...
Interviewer: Emotionally... upset...
Interviewee: Yeah. I saw a lady one time just get mad at the guy she was with because he wouldn't buy her another drink--take off her high heal and lay his head wide open. Yeah! Oh, they can be so vicious, you know.
Policewomen
A．work together with policemen on the graveyard.
B．do the same thing as policemen.
C．can have days off but policemen cannot.
D．don't have to work double-backs.
SECTION B INTERVIEW
Directions: In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions.
Now listen to the interview.
听力原文：INTERVIEWER: Professor Nadelmanne, you have been one of the earliest and most listened voices in favor of drug legalization. Why are you for it？
INTERVIEWEE: Well, in my opinion, the most violent, outlaw economies created by drug prohibition are worse than drag use itself.
INTERVIEWER: Suppose drug legalization is in effect, then what's the first riling you do？
INTERVIEWEE: The case for legalizing marijuana is an extremely powerful one. But my idea of legalization is not based on the tobacco model, in which we make a highly addictive and deadly substance available at seven cents a piece to be sold in vending machines in packages of twenty. What you do is make it available, more or less like alcohol is made available, in places where it is relatively controlled, where you have to show proof of ID. With legal marijuana you could have health warnings on the label.
INTERVIEWER: Do you think that tobacco companies or pharmaceutical companies will come to dominate the business？
INTERVIEWEE: No, we can't afford that. Look at the tobacco industry internationally. Do they ever make an effort not to have it sold to children？ I'd like to see the federal tax on tobacco doubled or tripled. That would significantly reduce consumption, especially among new users, but would not raise the price so high it would encourage a black market.
INTERVIEWER: So marijuana is legal, what next？
INTERVIEWEE: On a realistic level, we're going to have to go step by step. For example, we are not going to legalize crack; what we will do is legalize 15 percent cocaine. Let's say the government will make available 15 percent-pure cocaine. What would happen？ Clearly a lot of people using 60 percent cocaine would be just as satisfied with 15 percent. They would be better-off, in all likelihood, because they are using a weaker drug and not as much of it.
INTERVIEWER: What would you do about PCP and heroin？
INTERVIEWEE: I don't think it's a good idea to introduce particular types of drugs into places where there is no demand for them. But if there is a lot of PCP use in this city, then the government comes in and regulates its sale. The object is to undercut the criminal element.
INTERVIEWER: What do you sec when you look into the future of the drug situation？
INTERVIEWEE: You hear knowledgeable people say that the knowledge to manufacture mindalerting substances at home is the type of knowledge anybody with a high school chemistry education will have.
INTERVIEWER: So what are we going to do then.* To ban high school chemistry courses？
INTERVIEWEE: Well, almost every society has found some form. of chemical substance to alter one's state of consciousness. Some societies have been very successful at integrating this into their culture and using it in almost totally nondestructive ways. Somehow public policy has to find a way of encouraging people not to abuse drugs, or at least to use them more safely. Then we need to find the best ways to deal with those people who don't know how to use them safely. Not by throwing them in jail, but by finding ways to help them.
This interview is mainly about______.
A．drug prohibition
B．drug trafficking
C．drug legalization
D．drug effects
警告：系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“简答题”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
